- Aug 25, 2006
- 12,723
- 16,854
so just because they signed post ramos means he shouldn't get credit?
can't we just blame all the bad ones on Jol then in that case?
Bent replaced both defoe & Mido & in my opinion, is a better player than both, and if we had been unfortunate enough to actually have either Keane or Berbatov injured for a good period, I think we'd have seen him get into his groove again. You say Bale is too early to tell as a good signing, but then write Bent off as a bad one?
Seems a little biased to me.
I don't think Ramos should get credit, but i think we cannot give credit either way as it is unclear who did sign them, however it is clear who signed the other players before, if you read anything Jol has said he did not have anything to do with a lot of our signings over the last 2 years.
Bent replaced Mido, not Deofe, and is not worth £7.5m more than Defoe, especially when he will be playing as a 3rd striker, so seems pointless to me to have spent all that money on him.
Bale hasn't been given the chance to play or train all season since he broke his foot. whereas Bent has been given chances throughout the season and has been training every week and has not pushed out either Keane or Berbatov from the starting line-up.
I'm not writing Bent off at all, i actually think Bent is a very good player and a good signing for us, but i question the amount we paid for him, when we already had a capable player in Defoe warming the bench.
I don't think Ramos should get credit, but i think we cannot give credit either way as it is unclear who did sign them, however it is clear who signed the other players before, if you read anything Jol has said he did not have anything to do with a lot of our signings over the last 2 years.