- Dec 6, 2006
- 664
- 1,644
Chadli's handsomeness - 13/10
Lloris - 8 - But its not a good sign to have your goalkeeper as MoM every game.
Fazio - Above shoulder height 9. Any where below 5 - so 7.
Walker - 6.5 - Getting there.
Vertonghen - 8 - A bit of a dirty player is he, I like
Rose - 7.5 - Good game. Very industrious
Mason - NET -
Bentaleb - 8 - Very good game overall
Eriksen - 7 not involved enough, but enough to make a difference
Chadli - 9 - =MOTM, absolute class performance. Creating and scoring and taking more responsibility
Townsend - 7 Faded and went
Kane - 9 - He has taken the great responsibility of the mantle of chief striker away from our more costly and more eratic imports. Carry on please. We've lacked a goalscoring striker for so long now.
Dembele - 7.5 Carried the ball well and covered when needed
Davies - 6.5
Paulinho - 6
couldn't davies have done better for the 3rd?
3rd goal was the whole team's fault for switching off but I have no idea why Walker was with Fazio marking Costa- he should have been where Terry was IMO.Maybe, but the centre backs and Walker were asleep, leaving Terry unmarked.
If the game had finished 5-3 and the Chelsea goals had resulted from good play on their part, then there's not a lot our defence could have done about it. Unfortunately, we gifted them 3 goals due to p*ss poor defending. Even Kane said after the game the team were disappointed to have given away 2 poor goals in the second half.
3rd goal was the whole team's fault for switching off but I have no idea why Walker was with Fazio marking Costa- he should have been where Terry was IMO.
I didn't think he played too badly TBH. He always puts a lot of effort in and he was the player who was least destroyed by Hazard . I think there was one moment where he was too far forward and found it difficult to get back but apart from that he wasn't bad.Walker's obviously lacking game time and not at 100% match sharpness yet, but there were several occasions that he lost his man/forgot to mark him. I would like to put this down to him being out for a long time, but he was making similar mistakes prior to his injury. Hopefully the arrival of Yedlin will yield the same results as Davies did with Rose early season.
No I love the fact that he has klinsmanns numberAs soon as Soldado goes Kane should take the number 9 shirt...scoring two goals against Chelsea is confirmation that Harry Kane has come of age.
Not really as he has list his man/Walker's obviously lacking game time and not at 100% match sharpness yet, but there were several occasions that he lost his man/forgot to mark him. I would like to put this down to him being out for a long time, but he was making similar mistakes prior to his injury. Hopefully the arrival of Yedlin will yield the same results as Davies did with Rose early season.
Lloris - 8 - that save vs Azpilicueta was vital.
Fazio - 7 - Gifted them the 2-4, but was up to the challenge
Walker - 6.5 - Too much passing errors but not bad.
Vertonghen - 8 - A bit of a dirty player is he, I like
Rose - 7 - Thanks for that run for your goal
Mason - NET - come back soon Ryan!
Bentaleb - 9 - what a game from him at this age
Eriksen - 9
Chadli - 10 - My MOTM, absolute class performance. Creating, scoring.... he didnt hide
Townsend - 7
Kane - 10 - speechless. Long it will continue. What a difference such a class striker makes to your team. Heads off.
Dembele - 7
Davies - 6.5
Paulinho - 6
I thought we really missed our 2 record signings yesterday
rating them 4 is a bit harsh thoughDavies was solid, the other 3 were at fault for 3 goals conceded. They were mistakes and not as a result of good play by Chelsea.
What are the similarities? I don't know enough about Muller to make a comparison.
Look forward to the full analysis when it comes, meantime just wanted to comment on this bit. Basically some coaches can take credit for what they do on the training pitch, for the attitude and cohesion they instil in the team quite apart from whichever tactics they choose for this or that game. Whatever you eventually think of his tactics, Poch should get a high mark for what he's done with our team so far.
rating them 4 is a bit harsh though
I haven't watched the game again yet but in all honesty based on everything I've seen so far, including his time at Southampton, and as much as I really want to buy into Pochettino, I still haven't had that epiphany.
I think I'm seeing us press high up, as a collective in brief 10 minute spells, occasionally (often at the start and end of games)and sometimes we've been well organised (Southampton, Everton) but I'm seeing loads of games that we are wide open, have been outplayed for really large spells, and not just in midfield but teams have got into our box and created good chances, and not just good teams but really ordinary ones and for sustained periods of games.
I am seeing us play phases of good tempo progressive football, but I'm also seeing phases of disorientated, incoherent and lazy football.
Are we supposed to take it on trust that because this is Pochettino there's some method to this, but when it's Sherwood we assume it's tactical naivety ?
I really don't know if I'm seeing a team gleening the benefit of a a good training regime that has instilled stamina. Under AVB we would often dominate the game - with so called meaningless possession - and then find a late winner. Under Pochettino we often start well, are pretty hapless for the middle of the game then finish well. Is this part of the grand plan ? I fins it hard to believe.
If this is all part of the grand plan, and what we are seeing is good habits beginning to pay off, whilst we get away with mistakes, then groovy, but there are times when games seem totally shambolic, with no discipline, no cohesion and no coherent strategy, and then Eriksen scores.
Even that game yesterday there were several moments where it could have turned on an incident. We played with verve and gusto at times, but we were deadly, they weren't, but play and chances were pretty even.
Same with the manU game, we could have been buried by half time. Leicester we should have been as well. But against ManU we were clearly the better side second half, pressed well, were more cohesive and finished much the stronger team.
I've always tended to look at overall performances as indicators for identity and pointers for the future. Whist there are (big) crumbs of comfort to be had so far, there are plenty of scary phases too, and I' really not sure how to read it all. Could be the short term pain for long term gain or it could be a guy who doesn't quite have a 90 minute strategy or who does have a 90 min strategy but is not quite sure how to tactically pull it off.
Balanced against this, and just to make things more confusing, this league gets tougher and tougher IMO. Big money is filtering all the way down and teams/managers/coaches are becoming generally more clued up in every aspect of the game the coaching, the tactics, the science.
Is some of what we are seeing - and the whole league seems to be seeing it in some really strange results - just the quality gap narrowing and games getting harder and harder to tactically manage and dominate, with even the lesser teams having the financial wherewithal to buy match winning players that can alter results.