Ratings vs Southampton

Discussion in 'Match Ratings Archive' started by Bulletspur, Oct 5, 2014.

MOM

  1. Lloris

    50 vote(s)
    13.6%
  2. Rose

    64 vote(s)
    17.3%
  3. Verts

    19 vote(s)
    5.1%
  4. Kaboul

    13 vote(s)
    3.5%
  5. Naughton

    1 vote(s)
    0.3%
  6. Capoue

    106 vote(s)
    28.7%
  7. Mason

    15 vote(s)
    4.1%
  8. Lamela

    21 vote(s)
    5.7%
  9. Eriksen

    49 vote(s)
    13.3%
  10. Chadli

    21 vote(s)
    5.7%
  11. Adebayor

    4 vote(s)
    1.1%
  12. Dier

    3 vote(s)
    0.8%
  13. Dembele

    1 vote(s)
    0.3%
  14. Kane

    2 vote(s)
    0.5%
  1. CowInAComa

    CowInAComa Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    5,171
    Ratings Received:
    +11,819 / 304 / -132
    I pointedly said we looked sharper, but not sharp. We still lacked the final ball, but I felt we just looked ever so slightly more likely to find one yesterday. It looked close to clicking, for me, than it did last week.
     
  2. boris

    boris Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,090
    Ratings Received:
    +1,829 / 126 / -65
    7 - Eriksen, Rose, Lloris
    6 - Capoue, Kaboul, Mason
    5 - everyone else
    4 - Adebayor, Chadli

    Thing is, we aren't better than Southampton. We're about on a par.
     
    • Disagree Disagree x 5
    • Creative Creative x 1
    • WTF!? WTF!? x 1
  3. Spurs_Bear

    Spurs_Bear Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    13,903
    Ratings Received:
    +12,228 / 444 / -202
    I cant agree with that mate, I think it's a bit generous to give us the Vertonghen header and not give them the Naughton cock up, did they not hit the bar too in the first half? Sort of the frame of the goal?

    Southampton are in a false position in the table, they've played us and Liverpool and QPR/Swansea/Newcastle/West Brom/West Ham, they aren't a great side, we certainly shouldn't be happy with how we held our own against them. Just think there's a few creatives going on.
     
  4. parklane1

    parklane1 Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    4,391
    Ratings Received:
    +4,138 / 178 / -73

    Agree, i was at the game and that is what i saw as well.
     
  5. jezz

    jezz Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    5,171
    Ratings Received:
    +7,402 / 481 / -237
    They had the better chances?
    That's laughable to say the least.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  6. cozzo

    cozzo Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    2,128
    Ratings Received:
    +2,357 / 152 / -59
    What did Harry Kane do, who you say had a better game?
     
  7. Bus-Conductor

    Bus-Conductor SC Supporter

    Messages:
    36,941
    Ratings Received:
    +45,273 / 2,065 / -619
    Adebayor fumbling after being put through by Lamela ? Our goal wasn't opportune it came after a good move and passes.

    What were the better chances they created. I can only remember the one at the end.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  8. Spurs_Bear

    Spurs_Bear Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    13,903
    Ratings Received:
    +12,228 / 444 / -202
    Really? Once you've stopped laughing maybe you'll realise it's not actually far from the truth.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  9. Spurs_Bear

    Spurs_Bear Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    13,903
    Ratings Received:
    +12,228 / 444 / -202
    So a chance that's not really a chance but counts as a chance?

    Did Lloris not make a save from one of the midfielders? And the one that Naughton air-kicked then blocked on the rebound?
     
  10. cliff jones

    cliff jones Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,803
    Ratings Received:
    +2,071 / 341 / -127
    have another look at your post and consider what substance it actually brought to the debate. Spamming it requires no supporting evidence at all in my view. Whereas you've now confirmed you spammed me in retaliation, which is a bit childish. Posts should be rated on content, not on anything else. Sunshine.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  11. Time for Heroes

    Time for Heroes Active Member

    Messages:
    494
    Ratings Received:
    +798 / 171 / -162
    Im with Spurs Bear on this.

    We are quick to count chances that didnt materialise into a shot on goal but discount the opponents.
     
  12. Gilzeanking

    Gilzeanking Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    4,506
    Ratings Received:
    +1,968 / 107 / -76
    I'm not qualified to comment on the game overall as I was away .So just the MOTD

    However , I expect the result has coloured some comments as it often does . Luck doesn't get a fair shake generally imo and it looked like it was on the toss of a coin who won this match . Incredible miss at the end .
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  13. jezz

    jezz Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    5,171
    Ratings Received:
    +7,402 / 481 / -237
    I don't usually spam people I give a response if I disagree with a post.
    I'm spammed you because I thought you might respond.
    Guess what? you did.
    But if you feel the need to spam and vanish that's your perogative.
    But don't bitch about when someone does it back.
    In simple terms don't like, don't do it.
     
    • Disagree Disagree x 1
  14. Coyboy

    Coyboy The Double of 1961 is still The Double

    Messages:
    13,987
    Ratings Received:
    +2,139 / 120 / -86
    You mean other than our goal and best chance?
     
    • Agree Agree x 4
  15. theShiznit

    theShiznit Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    10,618
    Media:
    1
    Ratings Received:
    +10,386 / 212 / -49
    The chances "they" created were actually created by our mistakes; The Naughton air kick which had come from 3 mistakes starting With Ade then Capoue then Naughton. The shot from Wanyama, that was from a Kaboul wild hack that Mason was perfectly positioned to clear.

    We created the chance for Ade that he fluffed and others mentioned, unfortunately we created most of their best chances too.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  16. Bus-Conductor

    Bus-Conductor SC Supporter

    Messages:
    36,941
    Ratings Received:
    +45,273 / 2,065 / -619

    So we can't count a chance created because it wasn't finished but you can count a shot from their guy from the edge of the box after Kaboul slices a clearance as a chance created ? If you can't count the chances created because the striker fucked them up then they created nothing at all because Mané fucked up his.

    So even by your own narrow criteria we won the chances.

    If, like @Blake Griffin you want to ignore everything that happens everywhere else on the pitch and just judge a game solely by chances created - and taken - in each box, then why bother buying a ticket to go watch a game ? You can see everything you think important on MOTD.
     
  17. Ron Burgundy

    Ron Burgundy SC Supporter

    Messages:
    2,550
    Ratings Received:
    +2,340 / 52 / -65
    I'm generally a pretty negative bastard about most things Spurs related, but I think we watched a different game!
     
  18. Blake Griffin

    Blake Griffin Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    11,256
    Ratings Received:
    +25,444 / 1,078 / -373
    still beats just looking on whoscored (y)
     
    • Funny Funny x 3
  19. Spurs_Bear

    Spurs_Bear Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    13,903
    Ratings Received:
    +12,228 / 444 / -202
    Which of course hasn't been mentioned this week because we lost the passing and are trying to fob it off as a good performance.
     
  20. Bulletspur

    Bulletspur The Reasonable Advocate

    Messages:
    6,140
    Ratings Received:
    +7,578 / 534 / -162
    If I recall correctly, it was an attempted cross as oppose to a shot on goal but I could be wrong
     

Share This Page