What's new

Ruud Van Nistelrooy

mil1lion

This is the place to be
May 7, 2004
42,644
78,376
Just what we need, and on a free transfer too. This would be a typical Harry signing.
 

nedley

John Duncan's Love Child
Jul 28, 2006
13,992
28,174
It mentions that he has flown over for a medical. Hopefully not 'the failed' medical that has been claimed...
 

bubble07

Well-Known Member
Dec 27, 2004
23,226
30,412
Ruuuuuuud!!! Can he form a partnership with Defoe though - at Least we would have a lethal pen taker. Maybe Harry wants 2 box strikers to allow more space for luka niko Lennon hudd et al
 

guy

SC Supporter
May 31, 2007
4,509
6,183
im praying for this to happen, this is the missing ingredient that will get us 4th
 

mattstev2000

Well-Known Member
Aug 15, 2007
2,802
5,561
Not sure about this one - articles all seem to state that he wants first team football which he'll either not get because of Crouch and Defoe or he will get it and one of those two will be benched more often. Either situation leaves us with another grumpy striker on the bench.

I still prefer having 3 top class strikers and then using either and up and comer as 4th choice (GDS, Obika) or at a push support from one of our midfielders (Kranky, Modric, Lennon).
 

Hoowl

Dr wHo(owl)
Staff
Aug 18, 2005
6,527
267
Ruud from a couple of years ago would be a no brainer. I haven't seen him lately though but the stats show he hasn't played much this year. Is there any danger that his injuries have caught up with him?
 

mil1lion

This is the place to be
May 7, 2004
42,644
78,376
Whenever he has played for Real Madrid he has still scored goals. A bit like Ronaldo i suppose. He'll be ideal for a 4th striker. Its always going to be difficult to get someone injury free and in their prime to compete with Keane, Defoe and Crouch. So someone like Nistelrooy who is in his 30s, has had his injuries, and wont be expecting to start every game, is probably the best we can get.
 

Yid-ol

Just-outside Edinburgh
Jan 16, 2006
31,197
19,441
if he signs today can he play tomorow? or at least be on the bench if picked?
 

ever

Frog-Mod
Staff
Dec 20, 2004
23,615
1,462
hink so, think theres like a 3pm cut off *

* note that is just a wild stab at the time
 

luptic

Well-Known Member
Jul 21, 2008
2,357
3,066
we wont sign him, would be nice until the end of the season, but i cant see it. Id be very surpised if we sign an outfield player in this window.
 

barry

Bring me Messi
May 22, 2005
6,505
15,345
Not sure about this one - articles all seem to state that he wants first team football which he'll either not get because of Crouch and Defoe or he will get it and one of those two will be benched more often. Either situation leaves us with another grumpy striker on the bench.

I still prefer having 3 top class strikers and then using either and up and comer as 4th choice (GDS, Obika) or at a push support from one of our midfielders (Kranky, Modric, Lennon).

If he comes he'll be first choice. Defoe usually offers nothing bar goals. Rudd is the same but is a much better finisher, well a much better predator in general.
 

WexfordTownSpur

preposition me arse
Aug 2, 2007
2,615
653
If he comes he'll be first choice. Defoe usually offers nothing bar goals. Rudd is the same but is a much better finisher, well a much better predator in general.
Kind of agree, I think he could start more often, but not over Defoe, more Keane! and then Crouch would be the option player.
 

Yid-ol

Just-outside Edinburgh
Jan 16, 2006
31,197
19,441
Could play Ruud up frount wih Defoe :shrug: would be my choice i he came in, dont see why we should piss of our top stiker this season and putto the bench for a striker wewil have a season or season ad half tops
 

tRiKS

Ledley's No.1 fan
Jun 6, 2005
6,854
142
Ruud in is far fetched but Rudd in to bench Defoe? that's area 51 type lunacy
 

Krafty

Well-Known Member
May 26, 2004
4,797
2,139
I can see some advantage in having him. A bigger predator in the box than JD might encourage us to get the ball into the box more than we did against the likes of Wolves and Hull.

However, I can also see him being crowded out by the sheer numbers of defenders, and his lack of mobility may not be we what we need.

But he would be a better option than Pav, for certain.
 

barry

Bring me Messi
May 22, 2005
6,505
15,345
Defoe has got alot better since his first stint at the club, but to compare him to Ruud, even at 33 is laughable. I think Ruud is still a far better player in every way bar pace, which admittedly is a major requirement to lack, but when you're as good as ruud it's not essential. Ruud's always been about right place right time. A predator in it's truest form.
 

Hoowl

Dr wHo(owl)
Staff
Aug 18, 2005
6,527
267
Could play Ruud up frount wih Defoe :shrug: would be my choice i he came in, dont see why we should piss of our top stiker this season and putto the bench for a striker wewil have a season or season ad half tops

I think we could pull off Ruud and Defoe up front. We have so much creativity from midfield now we don't necessarily need a partnership that rely on feeding off each other just people who can put the ball in the back of the net. Chance creation wasn't a problem against Hull we need someone who can finish consistently.
 

ostrov

Well-Known Member
Jan 8, 2006
1,451
1,058
To those who think he's old and past it.
Assanal signed Campbell, MC signed Viera. If we sign Ruud it would be very exciting to see who's gamble pays off.
 
Top