What's new

Ryan Sessegnon

Flynn

SC Supporter
Sep 2, 2004
2,538
6,722
I think this means the contract is written entirely in :greedy::chicken:(y) emojis
 

For the love of Spurs

Well-Known Member
Mar 28, 2015
3,445
11,260
Don't put too much pressure on him. Looks good and hopefully will be but lets give him time.

Need to sign him first aswell. It might all look good now but anything can happen before he actually puts pen to paper.

Yeh I know, just hard not to be happy with this IF it happens.
 

scat1620

L'espion mal fait
May 11, 2008
16,368
52,824
If we do manage to sign Sessegnon this summer, an extra little bit of icing on the cake will be that he would be joining us before he turns 18, which would mean that if he subseqently stays with us until past the age of 21 then he will qualify as a Club Trained player as well as a Home Trained player, which doesn't do us any harm at all in ensuring we comply with regulations for European competition squad selections.
 

eddiev14

SC Supporter
Jan 18, 2005
7,174
19,687
Excellent. We need to keep investing in players like this. May not be ready immediately but look at the success we've had from m doing it in recent years.

Bale
Rose
Walker
Alli
 

heelspurs

Le filet mignon est un bastion de rosbif
Jul 25, 2012
4,270
5,105
If we do manage to sign Sessegnon this summer, an extra little bit of icing on the cake will be that he would be joining us before he turns 18, which would mean that if he subseqently stays with us until past the age of 21 then he will qualify as a Club Trained player as well as a Home Trained player, which doesn't do us any harm at all in ensuring we comply with regulations for European competition squad selections.
Just a question about any supposed transfer fee. This pre-18 stuff looks great but isn't he also *out-of-contract* as of this month? If he is indeed not signing a Fulham professional contract then why would we pay a transfer fee to them? To avoid a tribunal? Because any tribunal would be less than 12M for a 16yo wingback of 'championship' experience. Or are we 'playing nice' with Fulham?
 

scat1620

L'espion mal fait
May 11, 2008
16,368
52,824
Just a question about any supposed transfer fee. This pre-18 stuff looks great but isn't he also *out-of-contract* as of this month? If he is indeed not signing a Fulham professional contract then why would we pay a transfer fee to them? To avoid a tribunal? Because any tribunal would be less than 12M for a 16yo wingback of 'championship' experience. Or are we 'playing nice' with Fulham?
No idea, squire. :D
 

tiger666

Large Member
Jan 4, 2005
27,978
82,216
Just a question about any supposed transfer fee. This pre-18 stuff looks great but isn't he also *out-of-contract* as of this month? If he is indeed not signing a Fulham professional contract then why would we pay a transfer fee to them? To avoid a tribunal? Because any tribunal would be less than 12M for a 16yo wingback of 'championship' experience. Or are we 'playing nice' with Fulham?

Some info here:

http://fullcontactlaw.co.uk/2016/11/compensation-players-24-mystery/
 

tiger666

Large Member
Jan 4, 2005
27,978
82,216
This is great, thanks. I still see RS as being different as he is still academy age. Will be interesting to see how it works out as 12M for a 16yo and Levy doesn't seem to mesh. Though he does seem to have potential.

Well I guess it's based more on the potential of the player. This paragraph:

"PFCC hearings require each club to provide evidence to support their valuation of the player in question. In making its judgment the committee will take into account the costs of both clubs in operating a Football Academy or Centre of Excellence, as well as the age and playing record of the player, the length of time he was registered with his original club, the terms offered by both clubs, the status of the two clubs, the substantiated interest shown by other clubs in acquiring the registration of the player and any amounts paid by the original club to acquire the player in the first place."

He's one of the most sought after young players in Europe, already appearing and scoring goals for Fulham. Being chased by many big teams. I can see why their valuation would be high and why a tribunal may agree. All speculation of course.
 

danielneeds

Kick-Ass
May 5, 2004
24,182
48,812
Just a question about any supposed transfer fee. This pre-18 stuff looks great but isn't he also *out-of-contract* as of this month? If he is indeed not signing a Fulham professional contract then why would we pay a transfer fee to them? To avoid a tribunal? Because any tribunal would be less than 12M for a 16yo wingback of 'championship' experience. Or are we 'playing nice' with Fulham?
It's possible he may have agreed to sign the pro contract with a gentleman's agreement that Fulham accept our bid. Or there may even be a clause in there. Either way I'm sure he doesn't want Fulham to get fucked over with what they receive.
 

RichieS

Well-Known Member
Dec 23, 2004
11,916
16,436
Well I guess it's based more on the potential of the player. This paragraph:

"PFCC hearings require each club to provide evidence to support their valuation of the player in question. In making its judgment the committee will take into account the costs of both clubs in operating a Football Academy or Centre of Excellence, as well as the age and playing record of the player, the length of time he was registered with his original club, the terms offered by both clubs, the status of the two clubs, the substantiated interest shown by other clubs in acquiring the registration of the player and any amounts paid by the original club to acquire the player in the first place."

He's one of the most sought after young players in Europe, already appearing and scoring goals for Fulham. Being chased by many big teams. I can see why their valuation would be high and why a tribunal may agree. All speculation of course.
We can still negotiate a fee with them without it going to tribunal and I suspect this is what we will try to do.
 
Top