What's new

Spurs are not a big enough club to sell Bale

tototoner

Staying Alert
Mar 21, 2004
29,402
34,111
Please read the full article 1st before posting a comment based on the title of the article only.

Personally I thought it was a very good read and a lot of excellent points raised, and I find myself agreeing with most of them

Spurs Are Not A Big Enough Club To Sell Bale
Jul 27th, 2013 @ 01:40 am › Robert Reed

I know, I know, I’ve done it myself. This is one of those articles you only clicked on so you could leave a deliciously patronising message at the end; possibly implying that I live in my mum’s basement, don’t have a job, am eleven years old and so on and so forth, but hear me out (then abuse me).

The latest idiotic tripe to come from the unimpeachable Spanish press is that our trusted ‘partners’ Real Madrid are set to offer €120m for our Welsh wonder Gareth Bale (get well soon Gareth, arse injuries can be a bummer).

It is perhaps unsurprising that what appears to be the majority of Spurs fans are of the same opinion; that being firstly that the story is bullsh…poppycock, and secondly that if it were true then we should take the money and run. Now, while I agree with the first sentiment, I cannot bring myself to agree with the other. I would like to explain why, so that even if you disagree you may at least acknowledge that there is some method to my madness.

I think the best way to do so is give a response to some of the most popular reasons for selling and, to emphasise my point, using the inflated figure of €120m.

Gareth Bale is a fantastic player, but he is one player. If we rely on him again this season and he sustains a bad injury we will be sunk.

True, but the reason we relied so heavily on Bale’s influence last season was because we had strikers who didn’t score goals, which is rarely considered a good thing. I expect that to be remedied shortly and as we have a very good manager, goalkeeper, defence and midfield already in place I see no reason why we won’t be able to at least hold our own against most teams this season without Gareth.

Gareth Bale has just had an amazing season, and his worth could be at it’s maximum. If he does not perform as well this season he could be worth half what we could get for him now.

Now this is undoubtedly true, but then of course the opposite could be true also. Bale has improved year on year and last season he turned into, frankly, twice the player he was before. The fact is though that as much as I rate Bale I don’t think he is as good as Messi or Ronaldo, so further improvement is certainly feasible. It’s a long old season, and while improbable it isn’t beyond the realms of possibility that by the end of it we could be in possession of a player considered to be the best in the world.

No player is worth €120m, so we should sell if they are such fools.

Well, in the loony oil rich playground world football is becoming (with PSG threatening to meet Lionel Messi’s extortionate buy out fee in a tit for tat argument with Barcelona), I’m not so sure that is true anymore. The worth of anything in the world I believe is defined by how much you can sell it for. If I had a meat pie and somebody offered me £50 for it, I’d be so eager to hand it over I may well drop it. ‘Darn’ I would then say, or four letter words to that effect, ‘that pie was worth £50′, and I’d have right on my side. A lousy analogy, so what. If you want creative writing go read Marca.

Ten very good players are better than one brilliant player.

Very, very true. Put ten very good players against Gareth Bale and they would run rings round him.

OK I am being deliberately obtuse but the point I am making is that until they change the archaic rules of football (sign my petition below) we are only aloud to play eleven players. With a terrific first eleven and a thin squad you will struggle to win things in the modern game, but with a big squad full of good but not great players you will have no chance of winning anything either. Quality, not quantity does not quite apply here but you need quantity with the right amount of quality. A response to my last article read ‘ten Dembeles are better than one Bale’. How is that exactly? How many of those Dembeles would you play at one time? I’m guessing one. Then you’d have a couple of Dembeles on the bench and a load of Dembeles who are getting the needle because they never get a game.

We already have a very good squad which needs tweaking in certain positions, and we have a lot of depth in some areas already. Does anyone think Holtby will be a regular starter this season? Or Lennon after the arrival of Chadli? We have strength in depth and some players in our first team (Lloris, Kaboul, Vertonghen, Sandro) whom I would not wish to change for anyone anyway.

We could buy four world class players with that money.

No we couldn’t. Next.

OK you won’t let me get away with that, and nor should you. I will explain.

For starters, Levy is Levy, and that leopard ain’t gonna change his spots. Do you think he would suddenly be happy to pay over the odds for a player just because there is more cash in the pot? He would just end up haggling for ages over, and eventually not getting, players who cost a lot more than the ones he does it with now.

So how much does a world class player cost? €50m? €60m? Yes, if they wish to play for free. A genuine world class player, the type we would have to battle the likes of United, Real, PSG and Man City for, would demand a minimum of €200,000 a week (I’m doing everything in Euros to save confusion, but that’s around £170,000). Falcao is reported to be on €14m a year! Even if Levy had a complete personality transplant and was suddenly willing to absolutely roger his own wage structure with extreme prejudice (leading to our other top players wanting some form of parity when their contract comes up for renewal) that would leave us able to buy possibly two, and neither would be as good as Bale. Cavani just went to PSG for €64m; factor in even modest wages and you have to be looking at near the €100m mark. In that scenario which other ‘world class’ player could we afford? Loic Remy? If QPR knew we had that sort of money burning a hole in our pockets, we probably couldn’t even afford him for what they would want. Everyone we tried to deal with would be wanting to get their hands on some of that ‘Bale money’.

In addition, signing a world class player is more than just paying the right fee; you have to convince the player you can satisfy their lofty ambitions in the game. Could we go to a player like Cavani or Falcao or even Suarez and say, ‘hey, we’ve got no Champions League football and we’ve just sold our best player (because that’s what we do), but check out this plush training ground! Don’t just look at it, go have a run around on that bad boy.’

This more than anything is the point I wish to make. We are not a big enough club to make that money work for us and give us what we have now with Bale. Aside from being the superb player he is the lad is also a magnet for investment, quality signings and not to mention publicity. Did you see the massive poster of Bale’s mug in Times Square, New York? That’s a Spurs player in a Spurs shirt catching the eye of countless Americans who, granted, mostly don’t know who he is. But they will!

We’d have €120m to spend.

Even that is extremely unlikely. To anyone who thinks that, let me introduce you to Mr. Daniel Levy; you clearly haven’t met. There is no way that our chairman would give an entire transfer fee of that size to his manager to spend on players. He would quite possibly withdraw it all in notes to throw in the air and dance around in with abandon, but not to piss away on players. A sizeable chunk of it surely, but not all of it. That is profit, and it looks nice on the balance sheet. There is a nasty rumour that copper wire was invented by Levy and Joe Lewis while fighting over a penny, but I don’t believe it.

Granted, that is a little unfair, and leads me to my next point. We have already spent £24m on players this season and the spending is set to continue. We are not a poor club, and do not need a huge cash injection to compete. What we need to live with the big boys is a great squad and some absolute, best of the best quality. We have it! If we sell Bale we will not. No other team in our league be it Man City, Man United, Chelsea and certainly not Arsenal have a player of such quality in their ranks.

If Gareth Bale played for another team we would not have a snowball’s chance in hell of convincing him to join Spurs, even if we paid €120m. To entice him we would have to be one of the absolute giants of the game and offer him stratospheric wages; yet here we are, with him in our team for next season, happy on comparatively meagre wages.

We have totally lucked out! One of the very best players in the world has just popped up in our squad to everyone’s surprise. He is literally for us a player money can’t buy, so why the hell would we sell him?

If the money would propel us into the big league spenders then that would be different, but it will not. Even with a one time windfall of that size the likes of PSG and Man City would still blow us out of the water. They can spend that much in one window on transfer fees alone and do the same the very next year. Don’t speak to me about financial fair play! Do you think Michel Platini will be excluding his own countrymen from the Champions League? Gimme a break.

There will come a time when Bale wants to leave, be it next summer or the summer after that, and that will be the time to sell for as much as we can get. While he is still happy to remain here, we should hold on to him at all costs.

So let the abuse commence! But remember, you will be abusing an eleven year old. Do you really wanna be ‘that guy’?

COYS!
 

hughy

I'm SUPER cereal.
Nov 18, 2007
31,924
57,126
It is a retarded article, but I can understand it.


Does that make me a retard?
 

guiltyparty

Well-Known Member
Sep 21, 2005
9,023
13,524
I haven't seen anyone say we SHOULD take the money, more people saying we WOULD take the money, ie they reckon Levy would. Massive difference.

I agree with his slightly long-winded and not particularly well articulated point but not sure it's answering a question that anyone's asking
 

tototoner

Staying Alert
Mar 21, 2004
29,402
34,111
Sorry...I stopped reading after the bollocks about most Spurs fans being happy to take the money.

That is the only point I didn't agree with but it doesn't detract at all from the authors reasoning why we shouldn't sell him
 

Mattspur

ENIC IN
Jan 7, 2004
4,888
7,272
That article is bang on. If we sold Bale, however we spent the money, we wouldn't be able to replace him. A bit like when we sold Berbatov.
 

tototoner

Staying Alert
Mar 21, 2004
29,402
34,111
I haven't seen anyone say we SHOULD take the money, more people saying we WOULD take the money, ie they reckon Levy would. Massive difference.

I agree with his slightly long-winded and not particularly well articulated point but not sure it's answering a question that anyone's asking

I see it more of a rant than a conclusion , but a very good rant
 

Wazza

Active Member
Jul 24, 2008
105
200
I think it's a great article - perhaps a number of points could be articulated a bit better but on the whole a good read and I agree with the message behind the article.

Bale is now considered alongside Messi and Ronaldo.

He is a money making and profile raising machine, and worth a lot more that £100 million to us.

Did anyone notice the number of shirts with "Bale" on the back in our last two games in Hong Kong?

RM have openly said that they don't care what he costs because as with Ronaldo and Beckham, they will make a lot more out of him.
 

Misfit

President of The Niles Crane Fanclub
May 7, 2006
21,264
34,956
I don't suppose the wishes of the player in question have any bearing on things do they? If Bale is happy to stay here, even if earning a massive wage for the rest of his career, DL will find a way to do it and happily so. However, unlike many fans, DL actually deals and lives in reality. He'll make the best of a bad situation when they day comes that Bale basically says, "no matter what you do, I'm gorn."
 

parklane1

Well-Known Member
May 4, 2012
4,390
4,054
There is a lot of bullshit being written by some who have far to much time on their hands.
 

Misfit

President of The Niles Crane Fanclub
May 7, 2006
21,264
34,956
Can't be arsed to read all that, can someone sum it up.
Bale is an inanimate object and so has no say in matters. Therefore, THFC should never sell him because he's fucking fantastic and it would be impossible for us to replace his quality or spend the money we got for him efficiently enough, which is hardly a controversial viewpoint.
 

thinktank

Hmmm...
Sep 28, 2004
45,893
68,893
Bale is an inanimate object and so has no say in matters. Therefore, THFC should never sell him because he's fucking fantastic and it would be impossible for us to replace his quality or spend the money we got for him efficiently enough, which is hardly a controversial viewpoint.
Cheers, Misfit.

Why did that merit a memoir-long post by the OP??? Jesus.
 

Misfit

President of The Niles Crane Fanclub
May 7, 2006
21,264
34,956
Cheers, Misfit.

Why did that merit a memoir-long post by the OP??? Jesus.

So let the abuse commence! But remember, you will be abusing an eleven year old. Do you really wanna be ‘that guy’?

I think he started out with the above line and desperately needed to share that wit with the whole world so much he shoehorned a rather haphazard and shallow collection of words about Bale around it.
 

CowInAComa

Well-Known Member
Aug 31, 2012
7,293
18,237
kids who are articulate and scholarly at 11 freak me the fuck out.

Should be out torturing animals and daubing penis pics on walls. what is the world coming to.

That said, its 100% correct. Bale is irreplaceable to a club like us who would just end up with 10 Dempseys if we suddenly had 70m to spend.
 
Top