- Sep 2, 2004
- 5,363
- 1,827
Absolutely agree with you. I was a pretty decent footballer, and I credit my first proper team and coach (under-9s and a couple of years after - Eversley, and a guy named Tom, in the Enfield/Edmonton Sunday League in the early 80s, for anyone who might know them) with a lot of that. He focused on ballwork in training and the football part of playing, and despite the fact we were in a league he forfeited many matches beforehand to give unregistered kids a game. He was all about pass-and-move, and didn't care about the results. We gave some teams a right shellacking, but also got twatted by some physically much bigger and faster sides.It is a tough one, and I have no experience yet of coaching with top level youngsters at the moment but I am very aware of how damaging the win at all costs, results results results results mentality is to our game. It's the first thing we need to drive out before we start consistently producing top quality talent I think - kids being able to be kids playing on smaller pitches, smaller team sizes and smaller goals = more touches and more fun, and no league structure and stuff like that.
I see your point, and would like to hear what our academy guys think of it - one big positive in this is they are playing continental opposition at an early age which is only a good thing for their development, just not sure what a Pen shoot out achieves really.
I was actually quite big for my age, but I wish that I had been able to play more of that game with the deflated ball on smaller pitches (name escapes me).