SPURS V ARCHWAY K.O. 10.30 AM 17/2/2015
- Thread starter prawnsandwich
- Start date
dirtyh
One Skin, two skin.....
- Jun 24, 2011
- 8,694
- 25,298
THFCSPURS19
The Speaker of the Transfer Rumours Forum
- Jan 6, 2013
- 37,891
- 130,526
The Offshore Game @theoffshoregame · 8m8 minutes ago
All rise, that's all for today. Will post a blog with reflections later. Hope followers found coverage useful and or interesting.
All rise, that's all for today. Will post a blog with reflections later. Hope followers found coverage useful and or interesting.
Blake Griffin
Well-Known Member
- Oct 3, 2011
- 14,162
- 38,449
61k capacity and fans can walk on the roof.
Dinghy
Well-Known Member
- Jun 22, 2005
- 6,326
- 15,561
A self confessed American with a "rudimentary understanding of American law and ... much more rudimentary understanding of English law"
It's just a nobody blowing off steam...
worcestersauce
"I'm no optimist I'm just a prisoner of hope
- Jan 23, 2006
- 26,967
- 45,256
The stadium will serve the betterment of the community because it will be the catalyst to the ongoig associated development not to mention that a new stadium is essential to the club's future and we will have one somewhere, elsewhere if necessary which will be to the detriment of the community.
Without doubt it will be of more benefit to the community than Archway sheet metal works which is a valid point.
All of which is irrelevant because the appeal is not about that, it is about the SoS decision and whether he took it properly, the judge may disagree with his decision but as long as it was taken properly thats all he can do, disagree, he can't overrule. Archway's case is nebulous to say the least and bollox to be specific.
Without doubt it will be of more benefit to the community than Archway sheet metal works which is a valid point.
All of which is irrelevant because the appeal is not about that, it is about the SoS decision and whether he took it properly, the judge may disagree with his decision but as long as it was taken properly thats all he can do, disagree, he can't overrule. Archway's case is nebulous to say the least and bollox to be specific.
mil1lion
This is the place to be
- May 7, 2004
- 42,539
- 78,166
robin09
Well-Known Member
- Jun 4, 2005
- 6,800
- 7,697
I'd take 59k and Paulinho can't walk on the pitch.
SimpleSimonSays
Member
- Dec 12, 2006
- 94
- 24
Does anyone know what will happen if Archway win the appeal and Spurs don't get to build the new stadium. Spurs have pumped an awful lot of money into the development so far. Does the land value stack up against the investment?
camaj
Posting too much
- Aug 10, 2004
- 8,195
- 883
If Archway win, it doesn't mean that we won't be able to build the stadium, it just means we can't force them to sell. That means we'd have to pay what they demand or walk away. Which is precisely why they're appealing.
The only documents I've seen mentioned are the ones suggesting that we have naming rights agreed but not announced. Can you point me to the info you refer to?
The only documents I've seen mentioned are the ones suggesting that we have naming rights agreed but not announced. Can you point me to the info you refer to?
Last edited:
Air Jordan 3
Well-Known Member
- Jan 27, 2011
- 560
- 1,226
Been trying to keep up with this today but might as well have been in another language. Is the general consensus based on today that Archway do not have much of a case or is it that optimistic?
- Jun 5, 2004
- 32,221
- 64,290
- Staff
- #213
Big day for us tomorrow.
I'm not sure there was anything there that we weren't aware of. From a tactical point of view, I think the QC for SoS will be happy he got to speak at the end of the day. AM QC managed to stretch that out without really adding a lot.
Anyway, without having to put a Nightwatchman in, I expect us to go after the old ball in the morning and smash them about in the sunshine.
COME ON YOU CRICKETS.
spursboy2008
Well-Known Member
- Jan 5, 2009
- 229
- 576
Will it be affordable housing or private investment?
- Jun 5, 2004
- 32,221
- 64,290
- Staff
- #215
Surely affordable? Surely that's what the council is crying out for?
I don't think there's any possibility they will rebuild their burnt out factory.
Worse case is that Haringey will maybe have to offer them 4 or 5 x market value (their demand is reportedly 10 x market value) blood money for the land, and they'll pass on the extra cost to us
Yep - more social housing for the ghetto. Preserve the poverty
The Sainsbury/University/Lilywhitehouse just gonna be there and kind of laughing us in The face.. And we thinking what could have been...
WalkerboyUK
Well-Known Member
- Jun 8, 2009
- 21,658
- 23,476
It would just end up being burned down again.
This is all about getting more money that Levy & Co offered to get them out of the way.
To be fair to them, I'd probably do the same thing!
