Hi all,
Just wondering what your views are on this crazy theory going around: tell Manure to piss off, tell Berba to piss off to the reserves and continue to let him train with the kids until he
a) grows up and stops moaning
b) signs a new contract with us
I write as someone who's worked in the city for the best part of 10 years, am a chartered accountant etc. and understand the value of economics - and the pain of letting an asset waste. I understand that he may let his contract run down for 2 years and we get nothing for him when he's around 29.
However, the counter-argument is simple - Michael Carrick (and some might say Robbie Keane)
I'm pretty sure Carrick was tapped up in the same way Jaap Stam and Berbatov were. We sold him - got "good money" for him - and yet losing our equal best player set us back two years. Losing Berba may well have the same effect. And worryingly we will continue the Carrick precedent.
I say we just follow the "scorched earth" policy. If we can't have him no one can. He signed the contract he can damn well honour it. And if he throws tantrums we fine him and we fine him. It will send out a message I should think. Because otherwise I can quite easily see the same thing hapening with Luka Modric and Dos Santos in 1 year. Watch this space.
And, boys and girls, it can be done. We just have to want it enough. I pay £860 for my season ticket - whats a few quid more to stop us being dicked on by the Big 4 continually being their bitch, being their feeder club. I for one am sick of it (a few months ago I'd have gladly let Utd have him, us have the money and let them win).
I have a dream - next game we stand in unison, chanting "MAKE A STAND" in a hypnotic trance-like fashion - in a perhaps futile bid to shift the balance of power.
Or we could just take the money Eek.
Just wondering what your views are on this crazy theory going around: tell Manure to piss off, tell Berba to piss off to the reserves and continue to let him train with the kids until he
a) grows up and stops moaning
b) signs a new contract with us
I write as someone who's worked in the city for the best part of 10 years, am a chartered accountant etc. and understand the value of economics - and the pain of letting an asset waste. I understand that he may let his contract run down for 2 years and we get nothing for him when he's around 29.
However, the counter-argument is simple - Michael Carrick (and some might say Robbie Keane)
I'm pretty sure Carrick was tapped up in the same way Jaap Stam and Berbatov were. We sold him - got "good money" for him - and yet losing our equal best player set us back two years. Losing Berba may well have the same effect. And worryingly we will continue the Carrick precedent.
I say we just follow the "scorched earth" policy. If we can't have him no one can. He signed the contract he can damn well honour it. And if he throws tantrums we fine him and we fine him. It will send out a message I should think. Because otherwise I can quite easily see the same thing hapening with Luka Modric and Dos Santos in 1 year. Watch this space.
And, boys and girls, it can be done. We just have to want it enough. I pay £860 for my season ticket - whats a few quid more to stop us being dicked on by the Big 4 continually being their bitch, being their feeder club. I for one am sick of it (a few months ago I'd have gladly let Utd have him, us have the money and let them win).
I have a dream - next game we stand in unison, chanting "MAKE A STAND" in a hypnotic trance-like fashion - in a perhaps futile bid to shift the balance of power.
Or we could just take the money Eek.