What's new

The Daily ITK Discussion Thread - 16th June 2015 - Cough up!

Status
Not open for further replies.

Lukasz

Well-Known Member
Aug 31, 2012
836
3,652
I'd like to be wrong but I can't help the feeling that Imbula would become another Stambouli.
 

lemony snickets

Well-Known Member
Aug 14, 2013
144
409
I'll donate 5,634.26 Zimbabwe dollars later.

13 pence,
If you have read this forum that long, you would have at least a vague idea over how many plan As have fallen through, and how many plan Bs have not happened because we spend too much time failing with plan A. When did we last secure a typical plan A sining? NOT counting those who simply happened by sheer dumb luck. When did we last sign a typical plan d-z signing? Hmm...


Modric by my reckoning.
 

Breezer

Position??? Magician!!!!
Aug 27, 2004
4,387
29,887
OK so that ITK just confirms what we already know it seems.

Our DM list looks to be:

1.Schneiderlin
2.Kramer
3.Imbula

I think it's great we seem to be pretty organised at this stage, but Imbula strikes me as a vastly different style of player to Kramer and Schneiderlin, so it can't just be me who thinks he's a pretty odd 3rd choice?
That's not the only problem. MS won't commit to Spurs and waits around all summer for a move to Utd or Ars. We continue to sniff around thinking he hasn't said no to us. Which might be true but we're basically his fall back option. In the meantime Kramer and Imbula are being approached by other clubs. It really is a game of poker but hopefully we don't miss out on all 3 signings.
 

o1fozzybear

Possibly the biggest fuckwit of all time!
Jan 5, 2010
351
688
Wouldn't mind that at all.

Some don't like him, but I really do.

To be honest it wasn't a dig at McCarthy more a sarcastic comment saying we want this player and also like another......but then end up with some other player altogether much further down that list aha
 

TEESSIDE1

Married, new job and Spurs on the up!
Jul 3, 2006
15,248
19,064
OK so that ITK just confirms what we already know it seems.

Our DM list looks to be:

1.Schneiderlin
2.Kramer
3.Imbula

I think it's great we seem to be pretty organised at this stage, but Imbula strikes me as a vastly different style of player to Kramer and Schneiderlin, so it can't just be me who thinks he's a pretty odd 3rd choice?

With the reported fee for Imbula I don't see why we can't throw several extra million at Southampton or Leverkusen as Schneiderlin is a proven and has performed exceptionally well in the premier league, whilst Kramer is a young German international and has performed very well at Monchengladbach in arguably the 2nd toughest league in the world. Whereas Imbula looks a cross between Zokora and Paulinho and is potentially a €18-25m disaster. Spending circa €30m on Schneiderlin or €20-25m on Kramer is much safer than spunking a huge sum on someone who plays in a pretty poor league.
 

Monkey boy

Well-Known Member
Jun 18, 2011
6,441
17,153
Exactly what I was hoping we wouldn't do anymore. Opposite of for instance Trix's view, I think we should go all in for the best choice of those who we *know* want to come. Rather than spend so much time failing on plan A that plan B players all become unavailable in the meantime, when they in fact could have wanted to sign. I'd rather Spurs succeeded with plan B right away than failing with plan A, B, C before landing D.

I can see your strategy on a Saturday evening out
 

talkshowhost86

Mod-Moose
Staff
Oct 2, 2004
48,299
47,438
If you have read this forum that long, you would have at least a vague idea over how many plan As have fallen through, and how many plan Bs have not happened because we spend too much time failing with plan A. When did we last secure a typical plan A sining? NOT counting those who simply happened by sheer dumb luck. When did we last sign a typical plan d-z signing? Hmm...

Two Summers ago we signed seven plan A players, and look what happened with the majority of them.

We've messed it up a couple of times admittedly, most notably in the infamous Berbatov/Frasier Campbell window, but that doesn't mean we should either throw loads of money at the plan A just to make it happen or give up completely on the plan A in the first place.

I like the fact that from the ITK it sounds like we've got a few options. Sounds like a very sensible way to do things at this early stage in the window so that come middle of July (suspect very little will happen before then) we're ready to get things sorted one way or another.
 

yankspurs

Enic Out
Aug 22, 2013
41,978
71,402
With the reported fee for Imbula I don't see why we can't throw several extra million at Southampton or Leverkusen as Schneiderlin is a proven and has performed exceptionally well in the premier league, whilst Kramer is a young German international and has performed very well at Monchengladbach in arguably the 2nd toughest league in the world. Whereas Imbula looks a cross between Zokora and Paulinho and is potentially a €18-25m disaster. Spending circa €30m on Schneiderlin or €20-25m on Kramer is much safer than spunking a huge sum on someone who plays in a pretty poor league.

Its really not as simple as throwing a few extra mill at the targets above him on the list. They could want higher wages than Imbula on top of the club demanding a higher fee. The agent fees and signing bonuses could be higher for the higher targets on our board too. Then theres also the issue of CL or their clubs not really wanting to sell.

IMO, Imbula, Bender or McCarthy is the most likely CM signing at this juncture. With each passing day, Schneiderlin becomes even more unlikely, IMO. The key there is to get it done early before Arsenal or Utd come calling. Also, I really dont think Leverkusen are all that motivated to sell Kramer after he just agreed new terms with them in January and is coming off a very successful loan spell with Gladbach.
 

yankspurs

Enic Out
Aug 22, 2013
41,978
71,402
Two Summers ago we signed seven plan A players, and look what happened with the majority of them.

We've messed it up a couple of times admittedly, most notably in the infamous Berbatov/Frasier Campbell window, but that doesn't mean we should either throw loads of money at the plan A just to make it happen or give up completely on the plan A in the first place.

I like the fact that from the ITK it sounds like we've got a few options. Sounds like a very sensible way to do things at this early stage in the window so that come middle of July (suspect very little will happen before then) we're ready to get things sorted one way or another.
Im not sure Chadli, Vlad or Capoue were plan A's. And I am fairly confident that Lamela only came off since Chelsea stole Willian.
 

Hoopspur

You have insufficient privileges to reply here!
Jun 28, 2012
6,334
9,703
Think I've got it. So the plan is to really go for plan b and not plan a, or should we concentrate on plan c? Does doing this make plan c now plan a, relegating plan a to plan c? Tricky one - maybe plan b then becomes plan c by default and c then b. Whatever we do I think we should plan it out and stick to our plan - now that's a plan. Unless of course we've got another plan. To muddy the waters slightly, what happens if there's actually a plan D? On another bloody planet! :coffee:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top