We were also playing with 4 attacking players and now we are currently using 3 attacking players on paper
Wonder if Paratici is that pissed off that he might consider walking?! Also wonder what repercussions this will have on relationship with Mendes who looked like he was lining up moves based on us getting traore as in Valencia selling guedes to wolves and then Valencia signing another one of his players to replace guedes. He ain't going to be happy to see this domino of trades collapse and that could harm us in future
In terms of the window yes it is as it gives the false impression that were good to go which were not. Last season we saw us make some improvements due to a bad start so it's hardly a conspiracy theory.
People want the squad improved, you're happy with it , good for you but giving a flying fuck about the actual game will matter in December when we have a tired group of players trying to compete in four competitions and were doing so with an unbalanced squad.
Emerson was 25 plus 5m, Traore is at least 40m but sounds more like its 50m and they want it all at once. Massive difference.Spending 30m for Emerson when we still have 3 other right backs at a club but refusing to spend 40m for Adama when we have space for another winger/striker at the same time doesn't quite add up IMO...
It already has, he’s managed to undermine 3 of his staff with one move
Later tonight, we will sign Sissoko back for £30m
As above mate I think we're short in forward areas.One huge squad improvement would be a player already at the lodge getting his head right and earning some of his £200k a week. It's all very well saying we should spunk a load of dosh for a creative midfielder but we already have one. That for whatever reason he is unavilable is not on the hierarchy.
Well maybe but that's kind of important reason ?I think you're a fantastic poster mate and I mean this in a light hearted way but you are the king of explaining away the decisions made by the club
Predictable, I believe I called this at the end of July
These are the sort of posts to piss people off. No need.Predictable, I believe I called this at the end of July
Its not that straightforward. Nuno may be willing to sacrifice Bergwijn in order to get Traore, as Bergwijn is probably easier to sell for decent money than Moura."Refuses to consider moving on Bergwijn to free up space/finances."
If Nuno was so keen to replace Bergwijn, I suspect he wouldn't have started him 4 times in the opening 15 days of the season. Selections suggest other attacking options, who there has been no ITK/rumour of us trying to moving on, are behind him in the pecking order so would logically be moved on before him. Not sure what I'm missing...