What's new

The Daily ITK Discussion Thread - The Benteke Bingo Edition 16th July 2013

When will we sign Benteke?


  • Total voters
    633
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.

CoopsieDeadpool

Well-Known Member
Jun 8, 2012
18,257
70,419
It's because JJ is verified mate...


Yes and chris has told all of us that LLM is very close to being verified, it's just 1 sensitive detail that they're working on. Like i said, if LLM hadn't already as good as assured the MODS that his info was kosher, do you think they'd have allowed him to continue to post it so freely whilst they continue to work on getting that final piece of verification?
 

bgoldie

Well-Known Member
Jan 13, 2011
265
908
It's because JJ is verified mate...
We're just having a bit of trouble trying to confirm some thing he's told us. He's being very helpful but there's obviously some stuff he can't divulge even to use privately and that's just making it a bit difficult to verify him. We're all talking trying to come up with a compromise which would let us put his stuff in the RO without risking things for him.

For now his stuff doesn't go in the RO but please show him the same respect you show the other people passing on information.
 

Rob

The Boss
Admin
Jun 8, 2003
28,038
65,180
Unverified ITK running unchecked.
Disagrees from mods.

Sounds like there isn't a LLM consensus at the moment.
If this was an important issue I'd suggest we need clarification down here in the cheap seats.
But as it's ITK, I guess is part of the rich blend we enjoy each year...

Plot thickens though.

We've explained several times now that we've not been able to confirm a few things LLM's told us but we're working together to try and make sure we're all happy.

If some of the stuff he's told us does come off that obviously helps a lot.
 

chrissivad

Staff
May 20, 2005
51,646
58,072
Yes and chris has told all of us that LLM is very close to being verified, it's just 1 sensitive detail that they're working on. Like i said, if LLM hadn't already as good as assured the MODS that his info was kosher, do you think they'd have allowed him to continue to post it so freely whilst they continue to work on getting that final piece of verification?


o_O
dont remember saying that.
Said there has been a problem verifying his info
 

JUSTINSIGNAL

Well-Known Member
Jul 10, 2008
16,041
48,811
Guys if you don't believe what LLM says please just keep your thoughts to yourself.

I actually suspect its more you don't want to believe what he is saying because it is shattering your dreams in some way.
 

worcestersauce

"I'm no optimist I'm just a prisoner of hope
Jan 23, 2006
27,020
45,348
Journo just posted this in the Benteke thread:

i think i said that towards end of last season.
i still dont think he will be at villa this coming season.
i have no doubt that his agent has been talking to clubs and got deals lined up. thats obvious.
Tottenham being one.
but there has been NO bid, and no club has been given permission by the club to talk to him.
but this is football.
PL is strong he will not give permission until the price is matched.
he wont weaken his stance.
and the board dont like Levy.
just the villa line I reckon, Paul Lambert won't decide the fee and won't have a veto on the fee.
We probably haven't made an offer as we would be negotiating and they have said he can go by putting out a valuation on him which means Lambert has accepted Benteke is going and no doubt is already working on replacements, in that situation he'll want it done sooner rather than later.
 

nailsy

SC Supporter
Jul 24, 2005
30,536
46,630
So, Higuain to Napoli, Bentekkers to us. Say Soton also go nuts and sign Leandro. Suddenly Assnal are right in the shit.

Me likey.

For a second there I read Bentekkers as Bendtner. It was a bad moment. :dead:
 

paulcumpstone

Well-Known Member
Jul 17, 2008
8,781
10,892
Am I the only 1 confused at the moment?

nope you ain't, whilst I'm happy to take LLM as ITK, none of the other ITK has really gone against his info, am just finding some of his snipets confusing, still want to know if hes suggesting we are after Higuain or if he thinks Arsenal are pinching both :unsure:
 

Spurs_Bear

Well-Known Member
Jan 7, 2009
17,094
22,286
Yes and chris has told all of us that LLM is very close to being verified, it's just 1 sensitive detail that they're working on. Like i said, if LLM hadn't already as good as assured the MODS that his info was kosher, do you think they'd have allowed him to continue to post it so freely whilst they continue to work on getting that final piece of verification?


But people are showing him the same respect, we dont want to get like COYS where the only way you are allowed to respond to an 'ITK' is with:

"Thanks POTL".

If people don't think his posts stack up then they have a right to question it, he seems to be taking it in good stead anyway. I haven't actually seen anyone call him a WUM. If they have then that's a bit much. The only comment I made was the one about the moderator marking two of his posts with 'disagree'. Do you not think that's a bit odd Coopsie?
 

Mullers

Unknown member
Jan 4, 2006
25,914
16,413
just the villa line I reckon, Paul Lambert won't decide the fee and won't have a veto on the fee.
We probably haven't made an offer as we would be negotiating and they have said he can go by putting out a valuation on him which means Lambert has accepted Benteke is going and no doubt is already working on replacements, in that situation he'll want it done sooner rather than later.

Lambert is no soft touch, look what he has done to Bent.
 

Rob

The Boss
Admin
Jun 8, 2003
28,038
65,180
Thank you (y).. Apologies to chris, it was clearly Rob who told us he's working on the sensitive issue.

Hmm I think you've misinterpreted that somewhat.

There's not a single sensitive issue like you seem to think. LLM gave us some info but we couldn't verify it so currently he's not been "verified" for the RO. He understands why this was and we appreciate he can't give us all the info we'd like in order to verify him as some of it would put his sources at risk.

As I said, please treat his posts with the same respect as everyone else and we'll work on trying to get him verified but it might take a while. Obviously stuff like Les taking the job would help his case a lot so hopefully we'll see movement on that.
 

Ghost Hardware

Well-Known Member
Aug 31, 2012
18,688
64,755
Same, it's bugging me. From what I've read seen Chadli is no bad player by any means which is why it's stumping me, Bernard seemed the obvious plan A. Unless we've given up and already moved onto plan B? But that would contradict all recent ITK on him,.
Exactly! Maybe I have myself to blame a little for getting unrealistically excited with the idea of Bernard for over a month now but he still seams the absolute perfect match for us both with his skill set and age. But as u say, dates on recent ITK suggest that we are still looking at plan A and Chadli is very much plan B... I wonder who it could be, I am struggling to think of many better young inside left midfielders who are as good, young and attainable as Bernard that would be considered a plan A.
 

ohwhenthespurs

Well-Known Member
Jan 3, 2009
1,773
3,018
just the villa line I reckon, Paul Lambert won't decide the fee and won't have a veto on the fee.
We probably haven't made an offer as we would be negotiating and they have said he can go by putting out a valuation on him which means Lambert has accepted Benteke is going and no doubt is already working on replacements, in that situation he'll want it done sooner rather than later.
Absolutely. Managers and chairmen will often lie to journalists. I've rung managers and asked about players signing and been told "no chance", only for them to be at the training ground holding the shirt up the following day.
I think it was Nigel Melville who rounded on one of my colleagues and accused him of being a liar for reporting that Melville was signing Mike Tindall for Gloucester, and Gloucester signed Tindall the next day. Clubs use newspapers to get the line out they want, and if The Journalist is a journalist , he could be being fed a line by the club here.
 

EnfieldYiddo

Silence
Aug 6, 2012
15,505
26,871
Exactly! Maybe I have myself to blame a little for getting unrealistically excited with the idea of Bernard for over a month now but he still seams the absolute perfect match for us both with his skill set and age. But as u say, dates on recent ITK suggest that we are still looking at plan A and Chadli is very much plan B... I wonder who it could be, I am struggling to think of many better young inside left midfielders who are as good, young and attainable as Bernard that would be considered a plan A.

Yeah it's strange, I mean it would have to be someone completely left field as a Plan A?

I'm still (naively) going to harbour some belief in the fact we may still be in for Bernard... At least until we hear what he has to say for himself in terms of transfers on the 25th after the Libertadores is finished.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top