- Oct 19, 2004
- 39,837
- 50,713
I said they weren't stylistically similar, so I'm not sure where we disagree. Modric is a metronomic pivot, Dembele is also a pivot but uses strength (holding up the ball and drawing opposition players to him), power and a short burst of pace (to create space for himself to lay it off to a player already on the move now moving into a zone un-or underoccupied. Where his uniqueness really comes into play is his ability to also act as a kind of target man when we're probing on the edge of the box. Many's the time an attack out wide has petered out and it'll be worked into Dembele on the edge of the D who either does his holding up/drawing in trick before playing a triangle that ends with the ball going back out wide or into the channel or sometimes he even switches play from one flank to the other all while pulling the defence all over the place. Again, its not about how they do it but about the effect that they exert. Both act as a major fulcrum of the transition.
I think people often focus on the wrong thing when Dier and Wanyama play together, they think it doesn't work because both are defensive. That isn't quite right, for me. Wanyama has more ability and mobility than that. What has changed in that dynamic is we no longer have the pivot, the player taking the ball in, drawing players to him, opening big areas for players to run into. Wanyama doesn't like playing with his back to go so seldom finds himself able to offer us that pivot transition. Instead when he receives the ball and can't see a pass he tries to run into the area Dembele would be trying to get the opposition to vacate.
I think where we disagree is in labelling Dembele as "good" for transition. I think he's good for ball retention, but not very good for transition. Luckily we have Eriksen, who drops into those 2/3 areas and plays like a defacto CM at times and gets us moving. What we could really do with is a player who can do that and be positionally dynamic and defensively sound too (not easy I know) which is why players like Tolisso and Keita are on our radar I guess. But also why we all hope Winks and Onomah get more game time next year. Players that are good for ball retention but also better for quicker transition.
Interesting that you single out Wanyama in the Dier/Wanyama axis, because I think Dier is much more of a problem in any CM we play, and I'd happily never see him there again. He's more uncomfortable than Wanyama receiving the ball under any kind of pressure (inc back to goal), meaning he hinders our ability to play out from the press, can't go past a player with the ball (like Wanyama can sometimes and Dembele/Winks and Onomah all can) and hardly ever plays a progressive/incisive quick transition enabling pass or takes risks with his passing and has a habit of retreating to the back line, dragging the team backwards 10 yards the first sign of a bit of pressure.