- Feb 1, 2005
- 55,683
- 205,779
- Admin
- #461
It's Redknapp being a vindictive red faced weasel.
Ironic.
It's Redknapp being a vindictive red faced weasel.
Im looking at his stats and he has started 3 game for us so far, 1 in the league, 1 in the FA cup and one in the CL. one game started in the league when we have played 25 already. you call this "given a chance" I call it a pathetic attempt to rotate the squad.
didnt he have the chance to leave in the window but opted to stay? to be honest he is a better player than peanut which made his purchase an odd one, hell he has played 15 minutes and already outscored defoe's league total :lol:
play him up front :lol:
How's he supposed to miraculously hit the ground running? Even superstar Modric needs a few months to get into any sort of a groove.
Who would you drop this season to play him? Vdv, modric or bale? As he can only play those roles.
It's called rotation. Or using your subs. In H's own words, some of our players are running on empty. Nobody's saying Kranjcar is better than Bale or VDV.
Stats stats stats, which also if you go by the fact he has come on 7 times this season, where you failed to miss that stat, where any of these stats fail to show that he was absolutely awful in them.
did krankie actually walk down the tunnel after scoring, not to return?
It's called rotation. Or using your subs. In H's own words, some of our players are running on empty. Nobody's saying Kranjcar is better than Bale or VDV.
I dont consider 10-15 min substitutions as "given a chance" either. It's like giving a small piece of bread to someone who has been starving for days if not weeks then claiming that you have fed them.
He's failed to impress for most of the season when he's come on. It's really that simple. Maybe he's now taken his chance but he certainly didn't in any other game he played in
Redknapp has the benefit of watching them in training as well though mate. He's signed Niko twice now hasn't he? So he obviously likes the bloke
"Fail to impress"??? Am I missing something? Did we just buy Kranjcar at the start of the season and none of us has seen him play before, or wasn't he one of our best players at the start of last season when he had to be played because Modric was out with injury? Kranjcar does not have to impress me at all, because I know how good he is and I have known it since way before he came to the Premier league, he was Portsmouth best played and he was the reason I didn't like when we had to play them. Any player no matter how good they are if not given the proper amount of games per season will get rusty eventually.