I find it amusing. Chelsea obviously haven't spotted an iconic but subtle simbol. And it is amusing that it is now on a banner carried to chelsea games. If say when berba went to Man utd, and they made a banner with a simbol of spurs we would give a laugh
But the bit at the bottom looks fuck all like that gate?
If Berba had gone to Man U and they had a picture of a tree behind him we wouldn't all be laughing because there are trees at our training ground. Would we?
But it doesnt matter if it looks like the gate or not, because if thats the the reason behind it being on the liverpool banner then it is quite funny IMO.
But the bit at the bottom looks fuck all like that gate?
If Berba had gone to Man U and they had a picture of a tree behind him we wouldn't all be laughing because there are trees at our training ground. Would we?
Um, the joke is the Liverpool fan who thought that the tribal tattoo design on the flag looks anything like the gates or the gates on the badge...
It doesn't matter how badly done it is (ant tbh its actually pretty accurate if you smooth the edges and remove the shield), it quite clearly is meant to be the top of the iconic gates, by Chelsea keeping it when they made the Torres thing, they are suggesting that although Torres is a Chelsea player he is still a Liverpool icon, or liverpool at heart. They also bringing a little bit of liverpool into stanford Bridge.
You don't happen to write poetry, or analyse literature to look for the metaphorical meaning of things do you?
As its just a mistake by the Chelsea fans who made the banner, there is no deeper meaning than that. It certainly does not symbolise they are bringing a little bit of liverpool into the bridge