[Update 29]The Duke re: Scott Parker

[Bizness]

Who The Duke
Date 10th Jan 2010
Time 17:49
Site FTL

....just heard.
Apparently this one does have legs to it.

Harry is trying to get hold of him.

That's all I know but the source is good.

Perhaps one of the right pwopa ITKs might want to lok into it a little deeper.

Duke does have some sources

 

[SId Trotter]

Rather hazardous assertion duke, Scott Parker does not want to come and wants to stay a Spammer, he was offered to us before, twice and didnt come either time as he don't like us.

 

[Bromavinci]

when exactly is 17.49am ??

 

[jolegend]

Rather hazardous assertion duke, Scott Parker does not want to come and wants to stay a Spammer, he was offered to us before, twice and didnt come either time as he don't like us.

Parker is/was a Spurs fan.

He only went for the money when he chose West Ham and Newcastle over us.

Would take him in an instant.

 

[chrissivad]

Can any views on Scot Parker be put into the Players Thread rather than in here again. Other wise we just go around in circles with everyone posting the same opinions on him in here as they did in the last ITK thread about Parker.

 

[spencerkeegan]

Yes F*king Please!

 

[WexfordTownSpur]

Can any views on Scot Parker be put into the Players Thread rather than in here again. Other wise we just go around in circles with everyone posting the same opinions on him in here as they did in the last ITK thread about Parker.

and that is why the old itk forum worked better! Because it was "read only" like it should be.

 

[Real_madyidd]

So what is this thread for? I am confused by what I am supposed to type in this?

Are we just supposed to discuss the ITK, without discussing it's contents (the player) or insulting the ITK? Surely that leave us with: Thanks.

 

[TheWaddler]

POTL on COYS has just rubbished this:

Not for us guys, sorry

 

[DC_Boy]

So what is this thread for? I am confused by what I am supposed to type in this?

Are we just supposed to discuss the ITK, without discussing it's contents (the player) or insulting the ITK? Surely that leave us with: Thanks.

I've always found the various rules concerning ITK/transfer forums confusing to say the least

but there's no doubt that both sections are very useful and thanks to all who bring and mod the info

 

[mattdefoe]

5 years to late no thanks.

 

[ryantegan]

Scott parker would only improve the squad and not the team. Surely now we should only be looking for players who would make our first XI better or could make it better in the future.

Thats why someone like Sandro or Muntari would be better options surely?

 

[ravo]

POTL on COYS has just rubbished this:

His seems to have proved himself as the best ITK around at the moment, so I'll take his word for it.

 

[TheChosenOne]

5 years to late no thanks.

I hate it when players who flatly turned us down in the past are re-associated with a move.

Fuck 'em.

 

[chrissivad]

So what is this thread for? I am confused by what I am supposed to type in this?

Are we just supposed to discuss the ITK, without discussing it's contents (the player) or insulting the ITK? Surely that leave us with: Thanks.

think of it as a 1 post stop (unless its a cryptic clue) to post a briew view on the first post. Then after that head over to the players thread for a discussion on him :shrug:

 

[frostytheyid]

From an impecible source: Harry is definitely interested. He is second choice behind Sandro but that is causing too many problems. It has been discussed at board level.

 

[frostytheyid]

Or even impeccable!

 

[michaelden]

Isn't Parker getting a rep as a sicknote?

 

[rebrab]

Parker's just left...










































Spiderman. He said he didn't want to make another film :shrug: it came up as one of the news stories on my hotmail page :lol:

 

[michaelden]

:lol: you inglorious...