Wenger: "Big scores have no meaning"
- Thread starter BoringOldFan
- Start date
CosmicHotspur
Better a wag than a WAG
- Aug 14, 2006
- 51,069
- 22,383
He's never scored with anything big himself.
The under-10s tend to be quite small.
The under-10s tend to be quite small.
worcestersauce
"I'm no optimist I'm just a prisoner of hope
- Jan 23, 2006
- 26,982
- 45,286
SS57
Your quote from arsenal mania was top drawer, it's nice to know that there are still some arsenal fans out there who can read a game.
He is right the warning signs were there in the last two games, close shave 2-1 win in the league and lucky not to get a smacking in the first leg.
We really do know how to play them now but I don't know that Wenger can change their game to get round that.
Nasty piece of work when the chips are down isn't he.
Your quote from arsenal mania was top drawer, it's nice to know that there are still some arsenal fans out there who can read a game.
He is right the warning signs were there in the last two games, close shave 2-1 win in the league and lucky not to get a smacking in the first leg.
We really do know how to play them now but I don't know that Wenger can change their game to get round that.
Nasty piece of work when the chips are down isn't he.
AllSeeingEye
YP Lee's Spiritual Guide
- Apr 20, 2005
- 3,085
- 434
rez9000
Any point?
- Feb 8, 2007
- 11,942
- 21,098
Big scores have no meaning?
Don't they? Oh. Thanks for that. I didn't know. I'm glad you're here to tell us these things Mr Whinger, I mean Wan*er, I mean Wenger.
Of course! That explains why two of your players saw fit to have a barney on the pitch. It's because the match had lost all meaning that they believed that they could concentrate on demonstrating to the world how completely without class they are.
I would imagine that the look of fury on your face as the Spurs goals continued to go in was because you were upset at having to be at a game that was meaningless.
I understand now. Quick question: Seeing as Fagiwankski let in 5 meaningless goals, does that now mean that he's your first choice keeper? I mean the fat f*** only let in meaningless goals, so surely he should take the place of Almunia, who, by your logic, lets in meaningFUL goals.
Oh, and one further thing: tool.
Don't they? Oh. Thanks for that. I didn't know. I'm glad you're here to tell us these things Mr Whinger, I mean Wan*er, I mean Wenger.
Of course! That explains why two of your players saw fit to have a barney on the pitch. It's because the match had lost all meaning that they believed that they could concentrate on demonstrating to the world how completely without class they are.
I would imagine that the look of fury on your face as the Spurs goals continued to go in was because you were upset at having to be at a game that was meaningless.
I understand now. Quick question: Seeing as Fagiwankski let in 5 meaningless goals, does that now mean that he's your first choice keeper? I mean the fat f*** only let in meaningless goals, so surely he should take the place of Almunia, who, by your logic, lets in meaningFUL goals.
Oh, and one further thing: tool.
austintexasspur
New Member
- Oct 1, 2005
- 81
- 0
The days have long gone since I gave anything that knobhead says any creedence whatsoever. He has shown he is classless on so many occasions it's a complete joke.
If the boot had been on the other foot last night, he would buried it right in out collective teeth.
Sorry Arsene, me old mucker, I'm afraid big scores have plenty of meaning.
If the boot had been on the other foot last night, he would buried it right in out collective teeth.
Sorry Arsene, me old mucker, I'm afraid big scores have plenty of meaning.
