What's new

With hindsight who could we have bought thats better

spursbri111

Active Member
Aug 20, 2011
307
376
watching us attack the last few games I wondered who we could have bought with the bale money thats better and probably cheaper than we paid. Apart from chadli and maybe erikson the rest seem like we massivley overpaid. Lamela may still come good but paulinio,soldado and vlad seem average at best. I would have gone for Milner, lescott,bony and ivanovic. Easy after the event i know but ffs the badini must have really rated these players and he s really screwed up
 

absolute bobbins

Am Yisrael Chai
Feb 12, 2013
11,657
25,972
Really, this needs to be a thread?

I'm going to treat it with all the respect it deserves we should have signed Iniesta, Busquets, Abidal, Pedro, Puyol and if there was anything left over then we should have got Xavi as a back up to Scott Parker
 

DaSpurs

Well-Known Member
Jan 20, 2013
11,816
13,655
At the time, I wouldn't have bought Soldado, Lamela, Chadli, or Paulinho.

Would have bought Ljajic, Benteke, Shaw, and Badelj. In hindsight, Badelj may have not been for the best because I'm not sure he's quick enough for the Prem. RW may have eventually not worked out, but I still think we'd have been more balanced because I think left wing was a far bigger problem at the time anyway. All in all though, I'm convinced my acquisitions would have turned out much better.
 
Last edited:

parklane1

Well-Known Member
May 4, 2012
4,390
4,054
Really, this needs to be a thread?

I'm going to treat it with all the respect it deserves we should have signed Iniesta, Busquets, Abidal, Pedro, Puyol and if there was anything left over then we should have got Xavi as a back up to Scott Parker

You forgot to say Messi and Ronaldo as well. :)
 

jezz

Well-Known Member
Aug 21, 2013
5,660
8,681
watching us attack the last few games I wondered who we could have bought with the bale money thats better and probably cheaper than we paid. Apart from chadli and maybe erikson the rest seem like we massivley overpaid. Lamela may still come good but paulinio,soldado and vlad seem average at best. I would have gone for Milner, lescott,bony and ivanovic. Easy after the event i know but ffs the badini must have really rated these players and he s really screwed up
Knee jerk, bye
 

jezz

Well-Known Member
Aug 21, 2013
5,660
8,681
At the time, I wouldn't have bought Soldado, Lamela, Chadli, or Paulinho.

Would have bought Ljajic, Benteke, Shaw, and Badelj. In hindsight, Badelj may have not been for the best because I'm not sure he's quick enough for the Prem. RW may have eventually not worked out, but I still think we'd have been more balanced because I think left wing was a far bigger problem at the time anyway. All in all though, I'm convinced my acquisitions would have turned out much better.
I'm convinced they wouldn't, but we'll never know.;)
 

DaSpurs

Well-Known Member
Jan 20, 2013
11,816
13,655
I'm convinced they wouldn't, but we'll never know.;)

Haha suppose not. Curious though, care to elaborate why you would disagree? I won't even debate with you, just genuinely curious why you think the options we did buy have/will turn out better.
 

danielneeds

Kick-Ass
May 5, 2004
24,183
48,814
Everyone Southampton bought, because their 2nd, right? They must be all good? Also I like everyone who plays for Dortmund and Atletico Madrid.
 

jezz

Well-Known Member
Aug 21, 2013
5,660
8,681
Haha suppose not. Curious though, care to elaborate why you would disagree? I won't even debate with you, just genuinely curious why you think the options we did buy have/will turn out better.
Ask me at the end of the season.
 
Top