- Oct 17, 2006
- 10,708
- 25,296
You know?!Bit weird
You know?!Bit weird
Fuck off, I’m only giving a fiver20 GBP x 62,000 supporters = 1,240,000
1,240,000 x 12 months = 14,880,000 for year
14,880,000 / 52 weeks = 286,153.84 weekly
Yep, we could raise 286,153.84 to cover his wages!
Fuck off, I’m only giving a fiver
20 GBP x 62,000 supporters = 1,240,000
1,240,000 x 12 months = 14,880,000 for year
14,880,000 / 52 weeks = 286,153.84 weekly
Yep, we could raise 286,153.84 to cover his wages!
Or we’re playing a cup game, stick the striker under one of 5 cups, twirl them around so fast that no one really knows where the “striker cup” is, then turn them all over, show they’re all empty and pull the striker out from behind your left ear.I’m pretty confident we will get a striker in ( I think the club not delivering on that two transfer window in a row would go down like a lead balloon with Jose and the club know that).
My concern is that they will simply be the cheapest. All this talk of “the under the radar player must be good if we are not really interested in these other good ones” is naive to me.
Hope I’m proved spectacularly wrong, but it seems very much we are not prepared to pay ( strikers cost more than other players, that’s the way the market is and always has been) and as soon as there is other interest we can’t get involved.
People need to lower their expectations in my opinion.
Perspective right there.20 GBP x 62,000 supporters = 1,240,000
1,240,000 x 12 months = 14,880,000 for year
14,880,000 / 52 weeks = 286,153.84 weekly
Yep, we could raise 286,153.84 to cover his wages!
The bit I don't get is.... we weren't in for a LB but that may have changed...the reason we were interested (in a lb) was because Sess was going on loan but now he isn't???? Sorry if I've misunderstood, I've had a couple ....
The bit I don't get is.... we weren't in for a LB but that may have changed...the reason we were interested (in a lb) was because Sess was going on loan but now he isn't???? Sorry if I've misunderstood, I've had a couple ....
The bit I don't get is.... we weren't in for a LB but that may have changed...the reason we were interested (in a lb) was because Sess was going on loan but now he isn't???? Sorry if I've misunderstood, I've had a couple ....
JJ just now
"FWIW it’s not under the radar anymore ??- don’t get hung up on YouTube too much either ?"
Carlos ViniciusAnyone know who he Is referring to? A quick google turns up 2 names that we’ve not been linked to this window but I like my access too much to start guessing games..
The Benifica guyAnyone know who he Is referring to? A quick google turns up 2 names that we’ve not been linked to this window but I like my access too much to start guessing games..
He’s liked some tweets and replied to people taking about Vinícius so defo himAnyone know who he Is referring to? A quick google turns up 2 names that we’ve not been linked to this window but I like my access too much to start guessing games..
Why did we not just go for prem experience - Wilson or King etc. don’t understand this move, assuming Mendez is pushing it.He’s liked some tweets and replied to people taking about Vinícius so defo him
I guess because there isn't any potential with those kinds of signings. There are a known quantity and unlikely to really push our compete with Kane. What you see more of what you will always get.Why did we not just go for prem experience - Wilson or King etc. don’t understand this move, assuming Mendez is pushing it.
Why did we not just go for prem experience - Wilson or King etc. don’t understand this move, assuming Mendez is pushing it.
Why did we not just go for prem experience - Wilson or King etc. don’t understand this move, assuming Mendez is pushing it.