It's more than just that. Whatever we think(and personally I like Gil) Conte doesn't seem to fancy him for whatever reason. We can't all shout "back the manager" and then start crying when the manager wants something we don't.
I would have used a better example than Dan James. Would you not be moaning? ?With some of the woe is me moaning at every unsubstantiated twitter link floating around, I'm considering it...
"Fuck my entire existence, we are definitely signing Dan James instead of the player I want. How could the club do this to just me, they've literally ruined my entire life by allowing some click seeking journo to post this link on twitter".
*and yes some of you absolutely do sound like this.
Just posted this in the appropriate thread.
www.spurscommunity.co.uk
It really is a shame that Conte doesn't seem to rate him. I think the kid has a lot of potential and id much rather he be given significant game time then some of the names we have been linked to but i know it doesn't work like that for the exactly the reason's you state. I wouldn't be surprised if he'd be 4th in line after Lucas and even Spence if he stayed.
Edgar Davids and Tom Huddlestone might doth their cap
I don’t know if Gil is not fancied by Conte. I think Gil wants a good chance to play to help him achieve his wish to go to the World Cup. He doesn’t think he will get the games with us.
Well, we backed Conte. These are his signings. He knows what's best for our club, better than anyone on SC, so, I tend to trust him. He's happy, we should be happy. Spending a lot of money on big time charlies does not equate to success. Look at United. Arsenal have made a lot of signings, but they still have - IMO - an average manager. Usually it's who's in charge makes the difference. Arsenal have had the easiest of starts of any of the top 6 sides. They will finish outside the to 4 (again).
I believe Dante Casanova is a playwrite as well as sixteenth century fannymerchant.
