- Jul 5, 2016
- 9,401
- 23,735
Alright, same as many, I've seen a fair bit of Aarons. Gets up and down well, my only reservation being his actual physical strength as result of his size.
But what I really want to know, considering alot of these RBs mentioned are supposedly to replace Aurier, can some please give a true insight into whether the player/s actually linked are actually better than Aurier.
I've seen so little of Celik and Castagne that I can't fathom whether this sees us improve or not.
Seen many saying Castagne would be great because he can play LB also, but also seen a few posts out and about comparing him to Trippier but without a decent cross.
Whilst I know there are said player threads, if some who genuinely have an insight to these RBs linked and how they compare to Aurier, and whether considered an improvement, hopefully it would be okay to post in the player they're supposed to replace thread. Namely this one.
Not seeking opinions from YouTube, but perspective from those that have watched these players numerous times.
TIA.
But what I really want to know, considering alot of these RBs mentioned are supposedly to replace Aurier, can some please give a true insight into whether the player/s actually linked are actually better than Aurier.
I've seen so little of Celik and Castagne that I can't fathom whether this sees us improve or not.
Seen many saying Castagne would be great because he can play LB also, but also seen a few posts out and about comparing him to Trippier but without a decent cross.
Whilst I know there are said player threads, if some who genuinely have an insight to these RBs linked and how they compare to Aurier, and whether considered an improvement, hopefully it would be okay to post in the player they're supposed to replace thread. Namely this one.
Not seeking opinions from YouTube, but perspective from those that have watched these players numerous times.
TIA.