- Dec 13, 2005
- 48,125
- 50,144
- Thread starter
- #15,541
Thats wrong in my tiny mind’s eye but I will grudgingly accept it.
Yeah he’s offside when it’s kickedCan't be offside if it's off the defender can it?
because it’s whether he’s interfered or not not about whether he’s offside from a lines perspectiveI don’t understand anything anymore.
I also don’t think I’ve ever seen the on field ref looking at the monitor for an offside call?
I say it again and again. But sending the ref to watch it on the telly is such a waste of everyone’s time. If VAR see it as an issue they should just rule it out. The only thing the whole tv on the side of the pitch does is massage the ego of the on field ref.Think that's probably the right decision but why take so long? He was obviously offside and obviously affecting play wasn't he?
but after the Rashford one against city anything's possible
I don't see why they'd call the ref to go and check the monitor if that was the case. The only thing I can think of was they wanted to put the decision in his hand as to whether Felipe played it deliberately or whatever.Presume they're saying offside because he was offside when the initial Newcastle pass was made. Haven't got the sound on.
He's offside and interfering with play, the ball ricochets back to Isak
Thats what I love about VAR, you see the score as 2.1 and go oh ffs. Get up and let dog out for a piss. Sit back down and its 1.1. Marvellous.
Blimey. Have you got crabs again?Legs like -
View attachment 123912