What's new

Spurs propose changes to loan system

Danners9

Available on a Free Transfer
Mar 30, 2004
14,018
20,807
From The Sweeper on Goal.. http://www.goal.com/en-gb/news/3774...rsenal-in-pole-position-should-barcelona-sell

TOTTENHAM NEW LOAN PROPOSAL HAS TOP LEVEL BACKING

Tottenham have made excellent use of the loan market in recent years, with the likes of Kyle Walker, Stephen Caulker and Andros Townsend able to hone their games while enjoying productive spells at rival Premier League clubs.

But Spurs have also seen deals collapse because of the rule which limits top-flight clubs taking a maximum one player on loan from the same club during a season.

In a bid to prevent a repeat of the situation on deadline day in August 2012 in which Jermaine Jenas was forced to abandon his proposed flight to the north-east to join Sunderland after his then colleague Danny Rose had already completed a loan switch from White Hart Lane, Tottenham have proposed an amendment to Premier League rule V.75.

Spurs want clubs to be allowed to take two players on loan from the same club during a season provided the loans take place in different windows.

The Sweeper understands that the proposal had the support of the Premier League board of directors when it was put to them at their meeting in London on May 7.

It is believed that the board will not object to Spurs’ amendment if it is formally put forward by the London club, heralding an imminent change in the loan rules.

------------------
Not a radical change but you can see why the club is in favour of it, I think there should be a caveat that it is just for players under a certain age - say 21 - for development purposes rather than to get an unwanted player off the books.
 

camaj

Posting too much
Aug 10, 2004
8,195
883
We've got a good track record of being at the forefront of change. I remember a few seasons ago we got them to change the rules to increase the number of subs allowed on the bench.
 

Luka Van der Bale

Well-Known Member
Jan 29, 2011
6,041
13,611
In a bid to prevent a repeat of the situation on deadline day in August 2012 in which Jermaine Jenas was forced to abandon his proposed flight to the north-east to join Sunderland after his then colleague Danny Rose had already completed a loan switch from White Hart Lane, Tottenham have proposed an amendment to Premier League rule V.75.

Spurs want clubs to be allowed to take two players on loan from the same club during a season provided the loans take place in different windows.
Strange that our proposal would not prevent a repeat of the above scenario.
 

Lilbaz

Just call me Baz
Apr 1, 2005
41,363
74,893
As i said in the other thread, i think they should ban loaning players over 21. This will stop teams hoarding players.

At the end of the day we criticise 3rd party ownership, but how is this any different?
 

Danners9

Available on a Free Transfer
Mar 30, 2004
14,018
20,807
As i said in the other thread, i think they should ban loaning players over 21. This will stop teams hoarding players.

At the end of the day we criticise 3rd party ownership, but how is this any different?

it won't, because there are hundreds of teams to loan players to. But, i agree, it should.

Not true. Jenas was moving in August

oh right, memory playing tricks.
 

Lilbaz

Just call me Baz
Apr 1, 2005
41,363
74,893
it won't, because there are hundreds of teams to loan players to. But, i agree, it should.
.

I'm talking a european/world ban. This would mean that young/fringe players will be a lot cheaper, thus could encourage more competition.
 

PT

North Stand behind Pat's goal.
Admin
May 21, 2004
25,468
2,408
i hope this isnt true, 1 from a club your competing with is enough.
Unless I've mis-understood your opinion, the loaned player (s) will be ineligible to play against the parent club so it wouldn't matter how many the opposition had collected of the parent company's ranks.
 

chrissivad

Staff
May 20, 2005
51,646
58,072
Unless I've mis-understood your opinion, the loaned player (s) will be ineligible to play against the parent club so it wouldn't matter how many the opposition had collected of the parent company's ranks.



You have a little, but i think i didnt explain it well.

What i dont want to see is a team with 3 Chelsea/City/Arsenal players playing in them against us and then going to one of those teams and having a weaker team to play against.

Would rather just see 1 and the clubs take it more on them selves to bring through the youngsters. Might also see some youngsters stay at the smaller clubs to get game time as well and we wouldnt see the bigger clubs just buying up all the young talent.

Just think it would be better for the game
 
Top