What's new

Match Threads Spurs vs Watford - Match Thread - Day 3 - KO 2:00 pm

Match Prediction

  • Spurs to Win

    Votes: 170 91.4%
  • Watford to Win

    Votes: 5 2.7%
  • Score Draw

    Votes: 10 5.4%
  • Goal-less Draw

    Votes: 1 0.5%

  • Total voters
    186
Status
Not open for further replies.

Spursberg

Well-Known Member
Jun 2, 2019
1,690
3,195
looking way off, and we can clearly see us struggling when we should be favorites, we are only set up for countering, need creativity.
 

CoopsieDeadpool

Well-Known Member
Jun 8, 2012
18,257
70,419
Is it just me, or do we not seem to be doing that pressing from the front thing again?

Also, another positive start from Dele. Though the lad is looking up, desperately in need of some movement ahead of him.
 
Last edited:

Erm33

Well-Known Member
May 10, 2019
4,080
7,772
Getting totally outplayed by Watford at home. Really missing the out ball to Lucas to commit a few players with a run.
 

SA_Spurs

Well-Known Member
Dec 6, 2006
916
1,141
old habits die hard - we've started like we used to. slow & ponderous, we better wake up a little else we're gonna be a goal down soon
 

Hitch

Well-Known Member
Jan 4, 2012
3,040
2,636
I do kinda feel like you're taking my original throwaway comment a little too seriously and all that. Was just basically a few posters talking about how Sissoko is destiend to have a great game against us when we've also been saying he's bad. When he very well could also just be bad for them. I just personally found that amusing and made a simple comment about it, my dude.

And like I said, I get it. I also don't think Sissoko is an awful footballer. I was just commenting on the perception on this forum that a lot don't rate him for us but now he's on another team we (even jokingly) expect him to have a blinder. I just found it amusing. It wasn't that deep
As one of the users of the purposely hyperbolic "worldie" term that you made a note of in your initial comment (just a few comments on from mine) I feel no issue in replying to a message that was clearly an indirect response to myself among others.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top