- Jul 15, 2013
- 31,567
- 147,695
The Gallagher links have been pretty consistent in the press all summer too.To be fair Brennan and Tosin have been earmarked as targets for weeks.
The Gallagher links have been pretty consistent in the press all summer too.To be fair Brennan and Tosin have been earmarked as targets for weeks.
To be fair Brennan and Tosin have been earmarked as targets for weeks.
And we just had ITK today that he’s an Ange target.The Gallagher links have been pretty consistent in the press all summer too.
I really don’t see the problem with signing him. Being cheap isn’t a negative, it just isn’t a good reason to do a deal on its own. We needed depth and he had done well in his PL audition with FulhamIt was obvious at the time we were only signing him for this reason. Problem is, a free transfer is not cheap or a good deal if we didn't really need the player. We then can't shift them on in a year or 2 and they bloat the squad causing problems when we have pressing needs in other areas.
He is a Spurs fan isn’t he.Scott was a real strange one as he'd have been perfected and would have come to us in a heartbeat.
Yes, seen at the stadium regularly.He is a Spurs fan isn’t he.
That seems like a good move to me to be honest. we should not be taking that kind of deal without an option. If stringing Barca/Fati along to see if an option materialised was the play, then so be it. If another club are happy to pay high wages to basically be his 'rehab club' for a year, then more fool them.Daniel was trying to be smart-ass thinking they would agree to a sale or option in mind hoping for a delay in the deal to resume talks on it today as the player said yes to it and Barca said no with Brighton offering the terms required after being informed by mendes. The player was convinced to play there on a dead loan.
He is a Spurs fan isn’t he.
But what about the money we made from getting in the champions league last year? We are told that qualifying is the most important thing in the world because of all the financial benefits! Show me the money!I believe Levy spent the Kane money before Kane left. It's gone.
We didn't need depth in his positionI really don’t see the problem with signing him. Being cheap isn’t a negative, it just isn’t a good reason to do a deal on its own. We needed depth and he had done well in his PL audition with Fulham
I’m sure it just means that the deal for a new striker has been done. (Where are the rainbows??)There goes our backup striker...
Jokes aside isn’t this true?? Are we really starting the season with only one (usually pretty impotent) striker at the club?There goes our backup striker...
Jokes aside isn’t this true?? Are we really starting the season with only one (usually pretty impotent) striker at the club?
Non we have VelizJokes aside isn’t this true?? Are we really starting the season with only one (usually pretty impotent) striker at the club?
Surely Levy isn't THAT stupid to leave us that short, its one thing having loads of shitty players to cover positions, but its another thing entirely to have no one at all!?I wasn't joking. We don't have a striker left for the bench as it stands.
Wait till we get the new stadium they said, it’s will be a game changer for us….But what about the money we made from getting in the champions league last year? We are told that qualifying is the most important thing in the world because of all the financial benefits! Show me the money!
I've now worked out what Levy meant by that. From football to NFL and then back again.Wait till we get the new stadium they said, it’s will be a game changer for us….