- Nov 3, 2009
- 501
- 810
Sorry, but I am incredibly bored waiting for next Sunday to roll round, and have been passing the time wondering about passion with regards to football.
It started with commentators saying that managers who didn't dance like Dervishes on the touchline lacked passion. Eriksson got that criticism when he was manager of England. Andy Gray constantly tries to claim that players should not be penalised when they pull their shirts off after scoring, because they are lost in 'passion' and don't know what they are doing. Many fans feel obliged to clench their fists, pull their face into an ugly grimace, and roar something, in order to appear passionate.
So, it seems that passion must be externalised for it to be considered real. When did that start? Bill Nicholson or Martin Chivers never pulled off their shirts when they scored - and nor did Andy Gray for that matter. Were they not passionate about the game?
Fans have always made loads of noise - in the distant past, mainly with whirling rattles - but have only in recent years felt compelled to contort their faces into maniacal expressions.
So, is it passion or fashion? As far as I can remember, Ravanelli started the shirt thing by pulling his shirt front over his face. Just about everyone copied that - right down to kids in the park - and it eventually turned into ripping the shirt right off, and waving it round in the grip of 'passion'.
During the 1970 World Cup, Rivellino of Brazil extended his forearms and clenched his fists after scoring. Prior to that the scorer normally smiled and shook hands with a couple of team-mates. The English commentators expressed wonderment at this new expression of 'passion', and every 12 year-old had to follow suit. Forty years later it has become virtually obligatory for any fan near a TV camera - and is now usually accompanied by a raucous shout of "C'mon!!!"
So do people do these things because they are passionate inside, or are they more concerned with other people thinking they are? As a non-demonstrative person who rarely externalises emotion, I am really curious to know!
It started with commentators saying that managers who didn't dance like Dervishes on the touchline lacked passion. Eriksson got that criticism when he was manager of England. Andy Gray constantly tries to claim that players should not be penalised when they pull their shirts off after scoring, because they are lost in 'passion' and don't know what they are doing. Many fans feel obliged to clench their fists, pull their face into an ugly grimace, and roar something, in order to appear passionate.
So, it seems that passion must be externalised for it to be considered real. When did that start? Bill Nicholson or Martin Chivers never pulled off their shirts when they scored - and nor did Andy Gray for that matter. Were they not passionate about the game?
Fans have always made loads of noise - in the distant past, mainly with whirling rattles - but have only in recent years felt compelled to contort their faces into maniacal expressions.
So, is it passion or fashion? As far as I can remember, Ravanelli started the shirt thing by pulling his shirt front over his face. Just about everyone copied that - right down to kids in the park - and it eventually turned into ripping the shirt right off, and waving it round in the grip of 'passion'.
During the 1970 World Cup, Rivellino of Brazil extended his forearms and clenched his fists after scoring. Prior to that the scorer normally smiled and shook hands with a couple of team-mates. The English commentators expressed wonderment at this new expression of 'passion', and every 12 year-old had to follow suit. Forty years later it has become virtually obligatory for any fan near a TV camera - and is now usually accompanied by a raucous shout of "C'mon!!!"
So do people do these things because they are passionate inside, or are they more concerned with other people thinking they are? As a non-demonstrative person who rarely externalises emotion, I am really curious to know!