What's new

The Spurs Transfer Wishlist & Scouting Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.

BuckeyeSpurs11

Well-Known Member
Aug 5, 2013
1,118
3,460
I don't understand why we need him. When Eriksen goes we have Gio. We need a rotation option for Lucas/Son if anything.

still unclear whether Mourinho rates Gio and if we make the deal permanent and once Eriksen goes, Bruno Fernandes is one of the closest replacements we could sign. I see a need, if its a matter of him or a center half or a right back or something else and we could only sign one then I'd prefer the defensive player but I don't think thats the case.
 

Hercules

Well-Known Member
Jul 23, 2014
5,718
156,731
Contract is exactly the same, just higher wages. An obligation Sporting were forced into once they refused to sell him, with offer from us in the summer.
 

Joely

Well-Known Member
Jan 20, 2011
1,751
4,767
Remember some talk in the summer that if Sporting rejected an offer for him they'd have to bump his wages up. Not fully convinced we need this guy. Suppose Eriksen going could open up an opportunity although he looks a different type of player.

A DM and fullbacks are probably they priority for me. I'd be happy with a a DM and a RB in January but in truth, we'll be lucky if we get anyone in the upcoming window.
 

Snarfalicious

Well-Known Member
Jul 15, 2012
15,727
72,100
Remember some talk in the summer that if Sporting rejected an offer for him they'd have to bump his wages up. Not fully convinced we need this guy. Suppose Eriksen going could open up an opportunity although he looks a different type of player.

A DM and fullbacks are probably they priority for me. I'd be happy with a a DM and a RB in January but in truth, we'll be lucky if we get anyone in the upcoming window.

I thought that was Lo Celso.
 

Ossie85

Rio de la Plata
Aug 2, 2008
3,924
13,231
I really hope we don't waste all summer trying to get Fernandes and we go sign what we really need which is a RB and a DM
 

Nick-TopSpursMan

Well-Known Member
Aug 4, 2005
4,165
20,033
We don't need Fernandes at all. If we don't sign Lo Celso just so we can get him I'll be devastated. Lo Celso is a far superior player.

We should be concentrating on fullbacks and a mobile DM as a matter of urgency. Then we can focus on a wing forward and CB.
 

brendanb50

Well-Known Member
Jul 21, 2005
4,487
3,895
We don't need Fernandes at all. If we don't sign Lo Celso just so we can get him I'll be devastated. Lo Celso is a far superior player.

We should be concentrating on fullbacks and a mobile DM as a matter of urgency. Then we can focus on a wing forward and CB.

I agree - Fernandes for me would be a good addition but i wouldn't want to lose GLC for him. Eriksen going may well allow us to add him but i still don't think we've seen what a fully fit GLC can do.

The priorities are as you've noted. I guess we need to see if Mourinho agrees.
 

Shadydan

Well-Known Member
Jul 7, 2012
38,247
104,143
It's funny how the narrative has changed, all summer people were saying that we need a CAM if Eriksen leaves and now people are saying we are fine with the options we are left with if that were to be the case.
 

Ghost Hardware

Well-Known Member
Aug 31, 2012
18,412
63,437
We don't need Fernandes at all. If we don't sign Lo Celso just so we can get him I'll be devastated. Lo Celso is a far superior player.

We should be concentrating on fullbacks and a mobile DM as a matter of urgency. Then we can focus on a wing forward and CB.
I ? agree with you. If we end up sending Celso back, as I very much doubt we will get CL and thus trigger the automatic buyout, and buy Bruno instead I will be really disappointed. Celso is a much better player IMO.
 

Shadydan

Well-Known Member
Jul 7, 2012
38,247
104,143
I ? agree with you. If we end up sending Celso back, as I very much doubt we will get CL and thus trigger the automatic buyout, and buy Bruno instead I will be really disappointed. Celso is a much better player IMO.

The obligation is Europe so CL or EL
 

Ghost Hardware

Well-Known Member
Aug 31, 2012
18,412
63,437
It's funny how the narrative has changed, all summer people were saying that we need a CAM if Eriksen leaves and now people are saying we are fine with the options we are left with if that were to be the case.
I think that's because people wrote of Dele or thought he could play elsewhere. Now Dele seems to be Jose's guy at number 10 then it does beg the question do we need both Celso and Bruno for a roughly combined figure of 120 mil (70 on Celso 50 on Bruno) when both play best behind the striker. Especially when we really need other positions.
 

brendanb50

Well-Known Member
Jul 21, 2005
4,487
3,895
I ? agree with you. If we end up sending Celso back, as I very much doubt we will get CL and thus trigger the automatic buyout, and buy Bruno instead I will be really disappointed. Celso is a much better player IMO.

Agree - i think when challenging on all fronts you can't have enough creative options. Look at City - we can't compete with that but you need options to create chances, particularly against tough teams to break down.

Part of me would like Eriksen to stay but his lack of application makes me a bit mixed on his future. If he goes, i'd like to keep GLC and add another to ensure we don't burn out his replacement AM in the team.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top