What's new

Wilson's Ban?

DC_Boy

New Member
May 20, 2005
17,608
5
well if it's not confusing- why are so many people confused?

of course it's confusing - if you're not confused you're not reading it properly and i suggest people who come out with 'try reading some tax legislation and acting all superior' should retune their attitude

I've read plenty of complex stuff in my time and i'll back my comprehension skills against anyone on here

see how (iii) leads to (iv) - and tell me that's not confusing

unfortunately I can't put chrissi on ignore for having such a superior and incorrect attitude, but star of davids - ignored :)
 

chrissivad

Staff
May 20, 2005
51,646
58,072
incidentally - to all you 'superior folk' out there - here's nicdic's take on events

noone is saying they are superior at all. I just dont find it confusing, but im sure i find other things confusing that others will find easy to understand.

nic is wrong on this, the info i posted is from the FA website

(iii) A Player who has already been subject to disciplinary action as a result of receiving
five cautions and then proceeds to receive a further five cautions during the same
Season,
will be subject to the following punishments: -
(iv) If a Player accumulates ten cautions in FTCM between the opening day of the
Playing Season and the second Sunday of April in the same Season, he will
be suspended automatically for a period covering:-
Two First Team matches

(v) If a Player accumulates ten cautions in FTCM between the opening day of the
Playing Season and the last day of the same Season, he will be: -
“Severely Censured and Warned as to his future Conduct”
 

StanSpur

Ronny Rosenthal
Jul 15, 2004
2,439
2,046
To be honest he will get booked against Fulham and therefore miss the next two games. Chances of him avoiding a booking for 3 games just to miss the Pompy game are unlikely.

A good point raised was the cards from cup games being included as it does dissadvantage team that progress in all compititions. I personally think that all cups should have independent suspension rules which will help to stop bigger teams picking up their 5th 10th or 15th booking just before a league cup tie against a 4th tier team. More importantly it means that if a player is sent off in the semi final of the FA cup then they miss the final and not a home tie against pompey where their team probably can cope without them. I've gone off on one now but basically keep the cards related to the competition they are in and it will be much fairer.
 

DC_Boy

New Member
May 20, 2005
17,608
5
fair enough but can't you see chrissi that iii implies that it's talking about a player who has been subject to disciplinary action - WILSON HASN'T

WE THEN GET A :-

which implies to me iv follows from iii

but iii doesn't apply to Wilson because he hasn't been subject to disciplinary action
 

chrissivad

Staff
May 20, 2005
51,646
58,072
he has been subject to disciplinary action. He hasn't been suspended, but he has been warned

(ii) If a Player accumulates five cautions in FTCM between the opening day of the
Playing Season and the last day of the same Season, he will be: -
“Warned as to his Future Conduct”
 

DC_Boy

New Member
May 20, 2005
17,608
5
he has been subject to disciplinary action. He hasn't been suspended, but he has been warned


Exactly my point Chrissi - so you agree that he hasn't been subject to disciplinary action, but can't you see that it is at least plausible to interpret iv as following on from iii - which talks about players who have received discplinary action

i repeat - I don't think the wording is clear at all - hence the confusion

EDIT - skip this - i need to rewrite :)
 

chrissivad

Staff
May 20, 2005
51,646
58,072
Exactly my point Chrissi - so you agree that he hasn't been subject to disciplinary action, but can't you see that it as leat plausible to interpret iv as following on from iii - which tlks about players who have received discplinary action

i repeat - I don't think the wording is clear at all - hence the confusion

no, he has been subject to a disciplinary action.

A warning about his future conduct is a disciplinary action.
 

DC_Boy

New Member
May 20, 2005
17,608
5
whoops didn't get my edit in in time

will come back

cheers for that chrissi - finally it is now clear to me

disciplinary action refers to a letter as well as a suspension

if people think that is clear, then i disagree

it's taken a four page thread for someone to elucidate exactly why it's a two game ban for wilson

i repeat - the wording is confusing, but rep to you chrissi for clearing it up :)
 

bigturnip

Tottenham till I die, Stratford over my dead body
Oct 8, 2004
1,640
49
That was the same confusion I had when I quoted the rules a couple of pages back, if the warning counts as disciplinary action then it's a two game ban and if it doesn't then it's no ban. The first time I read the rules I came to the conclusion of no ban and after rereading it I thought 2 games, so I vote they are confusing, but as long as the FA and the clubs agree on what they mean then it doesn't really matter.

Some people were adding to the confusion by saying it was a 1 game ban, but I'm not sure where that point of view came from, certainly not the rules.
 

StartingPrice

Chief Sardonicus Hyperlip
Feb 13, 2004
32,568
10,280
noone is saying they are superior at all. I just dont find it confusing, but im sure i find other things confusing that others will find easy to understand.

nic is wrong on this, the info i posted is from the FA website

I am...the only problem is I've now had to roam the earth in search of someone who is inferior:grin:

Complicated...come-on, this is the organisation who make the simple off-side rule so comlpex that the refs don't understand it, FFS:eek:mg:
 

bigturnip

Tottenham till I die, Stratford over my dead body
Oct 8, 2004
1,640
49
Complicated...come-on, this is the organisation who make the simple off-side rule so comlpex that the refs don't understand it, FFS:eek:mg:

:stupid:

Actually discipline is handled by The FA and the offside rules by FIFA, who's inferior now? :wink:
 

Wellspurs

Well-Known Member
Mar 9, 2006
6,379
7,734
I thought the FA was run by Lord Triesman of Tottenham why cant he make a special case for our Wilson.. just like that Gooner used to when he had influence, Ive forgotten his name?
 

JimmyG2

SC Supporter
Dec 7, 2006
15,014
20,779
Fascinating stuff fellas.
I thought I'd got it sorted then unfortunately I happened upon this thread and read the actual rules. Serves me right.

Why not just scrap all the deadlines and thresholds and keep it simple, like me?
5 yellows at any time in the season. I game suspension.
!0 yellows, 2 game suspension and so on.
or if they think that this is too harsh make it 6 yellows, then 12 yellows.
 

DC_Boy

New Member
May 20, 2005
17,608
5
cheers BT

for sure if we had the FA on here explaining it to us - we could probably all grasp it first time - but we don't - all we have is the phrasing which is not easy to follow - a confusion as you say futher added to by the idea that it was a one game becuase wilson hadn't suffered a previous ban

also - letters of warning are often not seen as disciplinary action (tho i agree for this as chrissi has explained they are)

time and again I've heard commentars putting on an ho-ho-ho voice when pointing out x player had run up ten cautions or whatever and would be reciving a warning letter (with the obvious undercurrent 'yeah cos that's gonna bother them')

and indeed in the world of law we live in, if you're naughty and have a run in with the police say, but all you get is a lettter warning you of your future conduct or some such, you tend to think, result

PS - I apologise to Chrissi and Star of Davids for losing my temper with them - but I was getting very very irritated by this thread - and the way people kept saying it was clear - both for one game and two games - without explaining it to me why it was clear

actually looking back - I see you had already identified the issue BT - so rep to you too if I can give it - unfortunately the ole cyber red mist had already descended and it was only after chrissi had explained the matter that i went back over the whole thread
 

JimmyG2

SC Supporter
Dec 7, 2006
15,014
20,779
Don't avoid the question chrissivad.
I make that a three game suspension.
Be gentle with me.
 

Stoof

THERE IS A PIGEON IN MY BANK ACCOUNT
Staff
Jun 5, 2004
32,221
64,290
noone is saying they are superior at all. I just dont find it confusing, but im sure i find other things confusing that others will find easy to understand.

nic is wrong on this, the info i posted is from the FA website

I'm saying I'm superior. :grin:

It only became confusing when people who were wrong got all 'posty'. If you stop people being wrong then you eliminate the confusion.

I vote Eugenics. That or sending an electric shock through anyone who pressed the "Open" button on the tube. That would kill a few thousand off.
 
Top