- Feb 1, 2005
Breezer says Poch is still talking to Zaha so here's a thread for you to repeat your onions on him.
Agreed, but if we did, we'd seriously challenge for the titleInteresting. I can only assume we’re confident Eriksen will re-sign and therefore have moved on from Lo Celso and will instead spend the money on Zaha. I just can’t see us spending 60m+ on 3 players plus Sessegnon and a RB. That’s Madrid level spending.
Totally agree. Surely he would block Clarke's path too. We'd be over indexing in AMs and that would have to come at the cost of other positions.I'm all for Zaha, but don't think we need him in the slightest right now. I'd be immensely pissed off if we spend a large chunk of our budget on Zaha and miss out on Aarons and Lo Chelso.
One of the things that the club have gotten wrong is squad management and I think and feel this would be the wrong purchase to make when other types of signings are more pressing.
Having read all the ITK this morning I think there'll be a couple of deals, as you say, and then they'll be lots of player juggling, as people leave and new faces come in.I think Lo Celso and a rb are the priority but after those id be over the moon to add Zaha, would eliminate the need for a proper Kane backup imo and let Parrott develop into that. The 2 deals mentioned need to come first for this to be a good idea though.
Id hate that because Lo Celso could mean we stop dragging dele back and allow him to join Son, Kane, Moura as one of our attacking outletsIf Eriksen commits I can see us dropping supposed interest in Lo Celso and using the funds on someone like Zaha. Not sure whether we need him or if he fits, but if Poch is onboard then so am I.