- Dec 18, 2012
- 882
- 3,223
Can see us going in hard for Schniederlin & Rodriguez now Griezmann looks out of the picture...
Lets go get Rebic from Fiorentina, will cost about 8m.
In what way is Konoplyanka better technically than Griezmann?Id personally would have much preffered kono instead to be honest. I dont think its good to have tooo many simila players and for me griezmann is not even as good as lamela or eriksen but he is a mix of the two just not as good.
on the other hand.....kono is a real twinkle toes and he really MAKES THINGS HAPPEN in and around the area. Technically hes better than griezmann and hes much more of an overall threat in the areas we would need him to be. Lamela-eriksen-kono is just mouthwatering and soldado would actually get a bucket load in front of them...... get kono and await thd cricket scores against anybody outside the top8
Lets go get Rebic from Fiorentina, will cost about 8m.
Kane can play that left wing forward role too, he did it more than once with AVB or Sherwood and quite well actually.I still think we may look for a more direct option who has striker tendencies a la Jay Rodriguez, so this may not be a bad shout. They can still interchange but it offers a different threat to the others in the attacking midfield strata.
Kane can play that left wing forward role too, he did it more than once with AVB or Sherwood and quite well actually.
I'm not talking about physical speed. I'm talking about ball movement.if you think Greizmann/Eriksen/Lamela wouldn't have enough speed...surely Kane and those two wouldn't either!
I'm not talking about physical speed. I'm talking about ball movement.
And I'm not advocating Kane playing there or anything, I'm just saying if Pochettino wants a Jay Rodriguez type playing there, rather than spend 30m on an overpriced English player, we already have Kane who has shown he's capable of that role.
I'd take Konoplyanka over Griezmann too. Both are good but Konoplyanka would add real pace and the ability to create something out of nothing (Townsend could have this quality too if he develops right). That will be necessary for playing against all the teams that bunker down and play 11 back against us. Griezmann/Eriksen/Lamela + striker is very appealing on paper, but I think it would be a bit too slow in real life. Konoplyanka adds something different. At 12m I just can't see why it's not happened yet.
I'd take Konoplyanka over Griezmann too. Both are good but Konoplyanka would add real pace and the ability to create something out of nothing (Townsend could have this quality too if he develops right). That will be necessary for playing against all the teams that bunker down and play 11 back against us. Griezmann/Eriksen/Lamela + striker is very appealing on paper, but I think it would be a bit too slow in real life. Konoplyanka adds something different. At 12m I just can't see why it's not happened yet.
I watched quite a bit of Griezmann. He isn't slow by any means, but he's definitely not as fast as Konoplyanka. No clue where you got that idea from. Griezmann is a much more technical player than Kono...I wouldn't say he is all that different from Lamela. Kono is more like a trickier, less physically overwhelming Bale but both Kono and Bale can just dribble past players and score, which is what an attack as technical as Lamela/Eriksen/Griezmann might be lacking.What I get from your post is that you didn't watch Griezmann at all.
Griezmann is seriously fast. Much faster than Konop. He has a lot of assists, and not to mention the amount of goals.
Seriously. Griezmann is on another level to Konop
What I get from your post is that you didn't watch Griezmann at all.
Griezmann is seriously fast. Much faster than Konop. He has a lot of assists, and not to mention the amount of goals.
Seriously. Griezmann is on another level to Konop
What I get from your post is that you didn't watch Griezmann at all.
Griezmann is seriously fast. Much faster than Konop. He has a lot of assists, and not to mention the amount of goals.
Seriously. Griezmann is on another level to Konop