What's new

Cain Hoy say 'No'.

CheeseGromit

Well-Known Member
Aug 22, 2013
747
584
There are alot of people here who wont admit that ENIC has done wrong by the fans. Those same people are the idiots who think there better fans of the club as they are english. Time to fucking open your thick skulls and stop jerking off levy and lewis.

I will make my own mind up thanks ( see previous post)

This is just a rant
 

absolute bobbins

Am Yisrael Chai
Feb 12, 2013
11,656
25,971
There are alot of people here who wont admit that ENIC has done wrong by the fans. Those same people are the idiots who think there better fans of the club as they are english. Time to fucking open your thick skulls and stop jerking off levy and lewis.
Me being a better fan than you has nothing to do with me being English.

It has everything to do with me being a pragmatic, intelligent and long term fan. A lot of the fans (mainly from the UK and Ireland, let's be honest) know how shit we have been for a long, long time and know that without petrodollars (which we won't get) or investment fund money (which we don't want) then the only way to build a club is through investing in the bricks and mortar.
 

SpursSince1980

Well-Known Member
Jan 23, 2011
4,754
14,485
wow this topic is all over the place! AVB! Uncle JOE! ENIC! Sherwood!! Don't even know where to respond to. I'll stick to the topic...

I think the assumption that the asking price was too high seems about right. And in turn, can see why some fans will be irked by this, as it feels like the club is being held hostage. But who's to say what type of supplemental investment Cain Hoy would have made. Right now, a lot of folks are mourning a memory that never was. A dream. That is all.

Time to move on. And if someone else comes alone who wants to meet the asking price, so be it.

I don't think this is greed on behalf of ENIC. I genuinely think that Daniel wants to see through the new stadium development. He truly believes that he has set the club on the right path to eventually be a top four perennial. Whether this is true or not, or we agree or not, remains to be seen.

The facts are plain to see though... under ENIC we have grown, and found a plateau as a top 5,6,7 team. And we've done so in a way that is financially sensible and smart. We haven't endangered our long term future, over short term gains. Yeah, it's super frustrating, but what can we do given the reality of our financial limitations?

Hate to be a defeatist, but after the frustration of being so close over the last three years, and therefore an elevation of expectation, I've come back down to earth. I will be trying my best now to simply enjoy the good days and be zen about the bad. Yeah, all easier said than done. But I suppose the truth is really sinking in for me now. We are who we are, and that will not change for the forseeable future. And I guess we all sorta know that... hence, some of us being enthusiastic about Cain, as they offered a glimpse of 'getting rich fast'... and then, the damn letdown.
 

Archibald&Crooks

Aegina Expat
Admin
Feb 1, 2005
55,620
205,316
So you think that people look objectively at what has happened at the club. Just because there is a vociferous group of anti ENIC it dont make it right Silent majority might come into somewhere or even objectivity but hey ho

Thanks for the offer !!!!!!!!!
shocked.png
 

Samson

Well-Known Member
May 14, 2007
1,154
304
Me being a better fan than you has nothing to do with me being English.

It has everything to do with me being a pragmatic, intelligent and long term fan. A lot of the fans (mainly from the UK and Ireland, let's be honest) know how shit we have been for a long, long time and know that without petrodollars (which we won't get) or investment fund money (which we don't want) then the only way to build a club is through investing in the bricks and mortar.

ENIC are an investment fund. They have been great stewards of the club, but we will need, as things stand, to spend more on players if we want to get the most out of the new ground that ENIC will doubtless build.
 

yankspurs

Enic Out
Aug 22, 2013
41,970
71,398
ENIC are an investment fund. They have been great stewards of the club, but we will need, as things stand, to spend more on players if we want to get the most out of the new ground that ENIC will doubtless build.
And thats exactly the thing!!!! Our owners are unwilling to spend a dime on the club. The way things are looking, if ENIC's thinking doesnt change, the gap is going to keep getting deeper and deeper between us and the top 4. We were top 5 for like 4 or 5 years straight. Now we are a top 7 club. And as the clubs above us continue to spend more and more money, and clubs behind us will be able to spend more, we will be left behind for 16 years until the stadium is paid off by the club without the help of ownership as they are unwilling to help the club. Arsenal took 5 years to pay off the stadium and be able to spend what they are currently because they were always in CL. It will take us at the very least double that time because we are rarely in CL, and when we actually did make it a few years ago, we failed to invest properly. Are fans seriously willing to wait 15+ years to be competitive again?!?!?!?!


Funny how for an investment company, ENIC doesnt invest in their most well known asset.
 

Lilbaz

Just call me Baz
Apr 1, 2005
41,363
74,893
How many owners of other teams put in their own money these days?
Roman, Sheik, Fernandez... anyone else?
 

cornelius knob

Active Member
Mar 9, 2013
301
512
How many owners of other teams put in their own money these days?
Roman, Sheik, Fernandez... anyone else?
Not quite sure. But all the other 19 premier league clubs spend more in real terms on transfers than us. Yet they don't all have uber rich owners.
 

cliff jones

Well-Known Member
Aug 31, 2012
4,116
6,709
Thing is.....you can say it was a PR stunt to get more name recognition, except it doesn't make a ton of sense as a PR stunt.

Yes they are "some company who no ones ever heard of" as you said, but how many people had really heard of Guggenheim Capital? What about Apollo Global Management? Cannacord Genuity? Moelis & Co.? Nomura Holdings? Piper Jaffray .....What about some of the larger groups out there like The Blackstone Group, Centerview Partners, Evercore, Houilhan Lokey or Perella Weinberg?

There are thousands of investment houses around the world, there are probably a hundred (or more) that handle similar (or higher) investment capital as Guggeheim. You will notice very few of them advertise to the general masses, they do this because it isn't part of their business strategy. They don't want to be known by the people with £10,000 to invest, they want to be known by people who have £10,000,000+ to invest. In short (and a huge generalization) they don't want to deal with peasants, they want to deal with aristocrats.

A bid on a football team raises their profile to the wrong people and it is in all honesty a much more convoluted method of getting their name known then they would need to employ.

Todd Boehly is one of the people involved with Cain Hoy, he is also the President of Guggenheim and is a part owner of the L.A. Dodgers....if he wanted the general public to know he was striking out on his own it would be far easier for him to go to a Dodgers game and "allow" himself to be pulled into a interview with the commentators during the game and mention he was striking out on his own....he is a big enough name in finance that the clip would be picked up on and played over and over again, Bloomberg would cover it, the WSJ and Forbes would have a blurb and he would be asked to be interviewed on the likes of CNBC, Fox, Sky or Bloomberg and all of these would be a much more targeted approach to getting their name out to the people that they actually want to work with than a failed bid for a football team.

These guys were almost assuredly interested in actually bidding for Spurs but were seen off by Uncle Joe with a valuation that was above what they were willing to spend.

I get where you're going with this but can't agree. First there are reports that uncle joe will sell for a billion, then they step up saying they can even at that price. Then there are reports headlined spurs takeover company in stunning islington sq development for example. All the articles point to where the new company's money comes from and who the big boys are. Clearly a stunt IMO
 
Last edited:

xtrac

Well-Known Member
May 16, 2004
1,939
1,002
God, even Wenger is saying we need to be bought up in order to move forward as a team... Dark times...
http://www.express.co.uk/sport/football/515647/Arsene-Wenger-Arsenal-Tottenham-London-derby
He has a point, all this nonsense that we are suddenly going to compete with the top 4 once the stadium is built by signing top players are blinded by the fact it could stagnate us for 5 to 10 years, especially without CL monies, hence why we need serios investment either by ENIC and additional investment companies or a buyout.
 

Graysonti

Well-Known Member
May 8, 2011
3,904
5,823
We should close this thread.

For all we know CH could have been a bunch of mess'ers (sig ? ).
 

HW61

Well-Known Member
Aug 31, 2012
682
3,634
Let's be clear here. CH were very serious. They are not messers in the slightest. Disturbingly heard over the weekend that Levy is even worse in practice than his own reputation suggests. They will not budge (at the moment) on an absurd price. Many suspected this but when you hear it from someone closer to the goings on it's a worry.

Up until and including the Harry days it is hard to trash ENIC compared to the Sugar days. But I am concerned that they are starting to hurt Spurs.
 

worcestersauce

"I'm no optimist I'm just a prisoner of hope
Jan 23, 2006
26,966
45,256
Two weeks in and they've ducked out, I can't help wondering how much they really wanted to buy our club!
Oh well, as you were.
 

SteveH

BSoDL candidate for SW London
Jul 21, 2003
8,642
9,313
Let's be clear here. CH were very serious. They are not messers in the slightest. Disturbingly heard over the weekend that Levy is even worse in practice than his own reputation suggests. They will not budge (at the moment) on an absurd price. Many suspected this but when you hear it from someone closer to the goings on it's a worry.

Up until and including the Harry days it is hard to trash ENIC compared to the Sugar days. But I am concerned that they are starting to hurt Spurs.

"They were just pulling our chain" according to a couple of gossips from my old life.
 

davidmatzdorf

Front Page Gadfly
Jun 7, 2004
18,106
45,030
Let's be clear here. CH were very serious. They are not messers in the slightest. Disturbingly heard over the weekend that Levy is even worse in practice than his own reputation suggests. They will not budge (at the moment) on an absurd price. Many suspected this but when you hear it from someone closer to the goings on it's a worry.

When a football club quotes a plainly-daft transfer fee for a player, then fans on the internet go nuts and scoff: 'Henderson/Carroll/Suarez/Bale/whoever isn't worth half that, they must be mad'. Excluding the cases when the press have simply invented the figure, a very high asking price generally signifies that the club does not want to sell the player and is intentionally setting an unrealistic price to deter bids.

The same applies to a football club. The most likely reason why ENIC set such a high value on THFC is that they do not want to sell at this time. The most likely reason why they want to hang onto the club is that they have not yet added enough value to it. And the best way to add more value is to build out the stadium.

In that context, their valuation is not 'absurd', it's designed to do what it did, which is to deter offers and stifle interest from anyone who might be contemplating a takeover bid.
 
Last edited:

SteveH

BSoDL candidate for SW London
Jul 21, 2003
8,642
9,313
How many owners of other teams put in their own money these days?
Roman, Sheik, Fernandez... anyone else?

Spot on
Fernandez has that vacant "why didn't I listen" look, more and more these days.
 
Top