- Jun 4, 2004
- 60,369
- 130,269
- Staff
- #41
With 30,000 suspects ahead of them.Agree. If arson then almost certainly the owners arranged it.
With 30,000 suspects ahead of them.Agree. If arson then almost certainly the owners arranged it.
I mean why now
The opportunity been there for 12 years
The owners have apparently claimed arson
Disagree. Spurs have won every step so far. The final appeal is in under two months. As things stand, the CPO stands and is likely to be upheld. In that case The Josip brothers will get the CPO value only.With 30,000 suspects ahead of them.
I didn't say 30,000 guilty people. I said suspects. How many of us are going to be asked where we were at 5am this morning when we walk into work? It's the easiest connection. Which is quite often the right one.Disagree. Spurs have won every step so far. The final appeal is in under two months. As things stand, the CPO stands and is likely to be upheld. In that case The Josip brothers will get the CPO value only.
According to practically all itk info, the Josip brothers are not interested in continuing their business. If they were, the offers Spurs have made would have been negotiated as the difference was comparatively minimal. The brothers see this as a big pay day for them and are out to make as much as they can so they can retire.
Makes much more sense for them, seeing as they were highly likely to lose and possibly couldn't afford the appeal costs to get a big insurance payout + cash for the site from Spurs.
I elect to hear that they had ramped up their insurance valuation 'because of the risk of arson from Spurs fans' etc.
Just my opinion.
We have been battling Archway for 12 years
In 2 months we would have won the appeal and Archway would have had no grounds for taking the case to the Supreme Court
Why would a Spurs fan do this now? Doesn't add up
Because they're a moron?
I didn't say 30,000 guilty people. I said suspects. How many of us are going to be asked where we were at 5am this morning when we walk into work? It's the easiest connection. Which is quite often the right one.
£100m stadium? DL telling us lies again!The owners have apparently claimed arson
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/ukn...king-Tottenham-Hotspurs-new-100m-stadium.html
I'm sure CCTV will pick up people setting the building on fire. Can anyone prove they're Spurs supporters or maybe one of Archways workers? No.Who has the most to gain from this situation? THFC? Spurs fans? Archway? Other local business owners?
I'm going to punt for Archway.
No no noooo he would have missed and set WHL on fire.I blame Jenas