Archway sheet metal works on fire

Hoddle&Waddle · Nov 25, 2014

theShiznit said:
Yeah Gazza's piss.

Apparently that's where Gazza thought they made Archers Peach Schnapps.

DaSpurs · Nov 25, 2014

worcestersauce said:
See I know you make a good argument DaSpurs and I respect your genuine umbrage at what you saw as a dig from SS57 but, and maybe I'm a big girls blouse, but 30% frightens the bejesus out of me, I'm not a fan of total CCTV coverage mind you.

Without trying to get too deep into it, I think a lot of it has to do with the fact that you don't have a government owned by the wealthiest tiny percentage of people on the planet. Our 1% owns over 99% of our nation's assets, and they're the ones running the government.

As the political philosopher Alan Moore once said (and famously paraphrased in the wonderful V for Vendetta), "'People shouldn't be afraid of their government. Governments should be afraid of their people."

With the resources and weapons at the disposal of the modern US government, removing the right to bear arms of the American people is unthinkable. This is certainly not to imply each are at odds with one another, or that one should ever even attempt direct physical harm on the other, but that balance of power has to be maintained.

On the surface I don't blame you at all, but I can assure you life here is nothing like what the media portrays with the frequency of shootings and violence. In fact, shooting numbers have actually dropped in all but one city here in the US in the last decade/

But Jesus, one camera/10-14 people. Do you give a thumbs up to the camera while having a wank?

SpurSince57 · Nov 25, 2014

DaSpurs said:
Lol, I've no idea who originally fed you Britons that crock of shit but it isn't even close to true. Only roughly 30% of us own firearms, and a massive percentage of that is people living in rural areas. It's clear you're a smart fella 57, I know good n well you can see past media-fed bullshit

But hell naw man the government harshing on my freedoms is far scarier than my right to bear arms against communism and jihad.

Yes, but some of them possess a pretty impressive personal arsenal, don't they? Sure, only about a third of the population owns a gun, but there are enough around for everyone to have one (and that's just the legally held ones, I believe).

Most CCTV cameras are privately owned, like the ones installed in and around football grounds, in shopping malls, petrol stations, railway stations, even private homes—at least three people down my street have them, as much for deterrent value as anything.

Not really the thread for this discussion, though.

Hoddle&Waddle · Nov 25, 2014

DaSpurs said:
Without trying to get too deep into it, I think a lot of it has to do with the fact that you don't have a government owned by the wealthiest tiny percentage of people on the planet. Our 1% owns over 99% of our nation's assets, and they're the ones running the government.

As the political philosopher once said (and famously paraphrased in the wonderful V for Vendetta), "'People shouldn't be afraid of their government. Governments should be afraid of their people."

With the resources and weapons at the disposal of the modern US government, removing the right to bear arms of the American people is unthinkable. This is certainly not to imply each are at odds with one another, or that one should ever even attempt direct physical harm on the other, but that balance of power has to be maintained.

On the surface I don't blame you at all, but I can assure you life here is nothing like what the media portrays with the frequency of shootings and violence. In fact, shooting numbers have actually dropped in all but one city here in the US in the last decade/

But Jesus, one camera/10-14 people. Do you give a thumbs up to the camera while having a wank?

I can confirm that yes, he does

DaSpurs · Nov 25, 2014

SpurSince57 said:
Yes, but some of them possess a pretty impressive personal arsenal, don't they? Sure, only about a third of the population owns a gun, but there are enough around for everyone to have one (and that's just the legally held ones, I believe).

Most CCTV cameras are privately owned, like the ones installed in and around football grounds, in shopping malls, petrol stations, railway stations, even private homes—at least three people down my street have them, as much for deterrent value as anything.

Not really the thread for this discussion, though.

Yes, those weapons are physically present, but despite that plethora only 30% of us choose to buy them. And with weapons, we're not talking a common good that can easily spread to the masses, we're discussing a commodity defended by that same commodity and by the very people who choose to procure them (and therefore willing to use). It follows then that the ownership/population ratio for availability is an exponential decline, unlike with something such as water or food. Also, one could make the argument those very weapons are primarily used for deterrent value as well, which is actually the truth for the vast majority.

But yes, you're right, wrong place to discuss.

Shadydan · Nov 25, 2014

Dougal said:
View attachment 16422

THFCSPURS19 · Nov 25, 2014

Is ENIC to blame?

ClintEastwould · Nov 25, 2014

Does this have to be either one of inside job or crazy spurs fan? Can't it just be accidental e.g. electrical fire?

THFCSPURS19 · Nov 25, 2014

Shadydan said:

spurs9 · Nov 25, 2014

prawnsandwich said:
Cameron blaming the internet for terrorism-before it was newspapers and books and meetings-I suppose the postal service is to blame for parcel bombs.

Nah, it's the fault of violent video games.

Shadydan · Nov 25, 2014

THFCSPURS19 said:

Well spotted.

spurs9 · Nov 25, 2014

DaSpurs said:
Yes, those weapons are physically present, but despite that plethora only 30% of us choose to buy them. And with weapons, we're not talking a common good that can easily spread to the masses, we're discussing a commodity defended by that same commodity and by the very people who choose to procure them (and therefore willing to use). It follows then that the ownership/population ratio for availability is an exponential decline, unlike with something such as water or food. Also, one could make the argument those very weapons are primarily used for deterrent value as well, which is actually the truth for the vast majority.

But yes, you're right, wrong place to discuss.

Can we take it from this that you are a gun owner?

fridgemagnet · Nov 25, 2014

If it was arson surely it was only a few stray sparks from taking WHL up with it.

mk_spur · Nov 25, 2014

Can't be levy as he'd surely have sold the large can of petrol for 7 small tins of lighter gas for a net profit.

Mustard · Nov 25, 2014

I know he keeps getting mentioned but I really can't see Arson Wenger doing this.

Unless he was destroying some evidence maybe?

The sick fuck.

shelfboy68 · Nov 25, 2014

mk_spur said:
Can't be levy as he'd surely have sold the large can of petrol for 7 small tins of lighter gas for a net profit.

He would have asked for two star petrol

markiespurs · Nov 25, 2014

THFCSPURS19 said:
Is ENIC to blame?

Yes, Enic out!!!

eViL · Nov 25, 2014

It was an Andros Towsend shot from September 2013 which recently re-entered the Earth's atmosphere and came hurtling back towards goal.

It missed, of course.

Gaz_Gammon · Nov 25, 2014

Spurger King · Nov 25, 2014

ClintEastwould said:
Can't it just be accidental e.g. electrical fire?

Probably a faulty Amstrad. Sugar finally doing some good.

Forums

What's new

Matches

Sportsbook

Members

Archway sheet metal works on fire

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

The Speaker of the Transfer Rumours Forum

Well-Known Member

The Speaker of the Transfer Rumours Forum

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Active Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

SC Supporter

Oliver Skipp's Dad

Well-Known Member

can't smile without glue

Similar threads