- Mar 24, 2005
- 711
- 895
he's skillful but people have rose tinted specs on with this kid, he over complicates the majority of things he does in possession and if he simplifies his game he will start to shine.
...Fergie said on Ronaldo
he's skillful but people have rose tinted specs on with this kid, he over complicates the majority of things he does in possession and if he simplifies his game he will start to shine.
I've made my mind up on him. He doesn't have the work-rate, the tenacity or the intensity to play in the system we all saw yesterday. He strolled onto the pitch and shirked tackles, ruined the balance and the touches he did have were poor.
It's clear we're all desperate to see a £30m do well and shine, but sadly, I think he will struggle to get a starting place from here on out.
Except Lamela isn't fast enough for this, and that's not his game.When on the break he needs to follow what bale did, knock it into space and run.
This would allow him to beat his man without having to try any fancy foot work.
Even dier was doing this against eventon.
He had about three opportunities yesterday to beat one man and be in at goal, but he was dealt with easily, worrying sign if you ask me. If Lennon gets a man 1 on 1, at least 7 times out of 10 he will go past him on the outside and get himself into a crossing position. Is Lamela not fast enough for this?
He had about three opportunities yesterday to beat one man and be in at goal, but he was dealt with easily, worrying sign if you ask me. If Lennon gets a man 1 on 1, at least 7 times out of 10 he will go past him on the outside and get himself into a crossing position. Is Lamela not fast enough for this?
He had about three opportunities yesterday to beat one man and be in at goal, but he was dealt with easily, worrying sign if you ask me. If Lennon gets a man 1 on 1, at least 7 times out of 10 he will go past him on the outside and get himself into a crossing position. Is Lamela not fast enough for this?
Lamela, Eriksen and Chadli all after the one spot. If Lamela had been a £5 mill buy he would be nowhere near the 1st team for EPL games and IMO probably would have gone in the summer.Except Lamela isn't fast enough for this, and that's not his game.
He has and always will be a number 10.
Except Lamela isn't fast enough for this, and that's not his game.
He has and always will be a number 10.
he does press but he's a bit of a wet lettuce when it actually comes to trying to win the ball.
He didn't start as a 10 though? If Dier can out pace people that way surely Lamela can?
His tenacity, work rate and intensity are all very good, IMO. He needs to reign it in sometimes and be a bit more controlled but as far as those raw attributes go, he's very good.
When on the break he needs to follow what bale did, knock it into space and run.
This would allow him to beat his man without having to try any fancy foot work.
Even dier was doing this against eventon.
I think Lamela is extremely, extremely one-paced. That's not to say that he is slow, but its a constant, pretty average speed. His problem is that he doesn't have any acceleration/explosive strength to him and he doesn't have an extra gear that allows him to go past someone.
I definitely think you are right in that he has raw attributes in those areas, but my reservations are whether they are applicable within the context of the Pochettino 'high press' game we saw yesterday. As some other posters have mentioned, he isn't fast enough, nor does he do anywhere near the amount of defensive work as demonstrated by Aaron Lennon yesterday.
We are weak/inexperienced at full-back, and as long as that is the case, we will continue to need players on the flanks who don't mind tracking back and chipping in. Giving good, solid back up. Lamela isn't that player.
He could be a world class Number 10. But, who would back him right now to oust Eriksson or Kane in that position?