- Jul 23, 2013
- 6,962
- 16,101
I often think people forget that Eriksen has only just turned 24. His best years are ahead.
its because of his receding hairline and imminent baldness....I often think people forget that Eriksen has only just turned 24. His best years are ahead.
If my memory serves me wasn't his last major injury due to a tackle that deserved a straight red when he scored?
its because of his receding hairline and imminent baldness....
I wouldn't be that upset with Eriksen leaving as long as we replaced with someone like David Suarez. Think Eriksen flatters to deceive on many occasions. Technically good player, but rarely imposes himself on a game
I wouldn't be that upset with Eriksen leaving as long as we replaced with someone like David Suarez. Think Eriksen flatters to deceive on many occasions. Technically good player, but rarely imposes himself on a game
I wouldn't be that upset with Eriksen leaving as long as we replaced with someone like David Suarez. Think Eriksen flatters to deceive on many occasions. Technically good player, but rarely imposes himself on a game
David suarez is a 36 year old who plays in French amateur league
So depressing how far behind Chelsea we are. They get £60M just for kit. We get less for stadium and kit together.
Not quite
Wiltshire did the damage to the ankle putting in a (deliberately) very nasty tackle during England training in June. The knee thing from the Sunderland match (September) was separate and minor. In the Chelsea match (November) he re-aggravated the ankle fracture Wiltshire had originally done, which is what he's now having operated on.
God and that little shit is in the squad with all our players again
I don't see Eriksen leaving - he's in the most competitive league in the world, we're about to play Champions League football and could conceivably challenge for the title next year. It's not happening.
Not quite
Thanks for correction. That Scum fella keeps cropping up. Maybe Eric can return the favour.
its because of his receding hairline and imminent baldness....
He's turning into Levy...!!
There's a limit on the increase in wages of the new TV money, £4m pa iircYep, he's not going anywhere. His agent is negotiating a new deal and with the new to money contract he'd be mad not to be asking the club to pay him mega money.
Sponsors back winners, not size reputation and tradition. Despite your feelings for Chelsea they are winners having been much more successful than us recently in the trophy haul.It's a number that is depressing. We are in CL, they aren't. We have an awesome new stadium coming, theirs will take years. We have a far bigger fan base than them. We have the best young team in the country, their squad requires total overhaul. Yet still they can get £60M a season just for their kit. Incredibly depressing to think the objective perception is that Chelsea is that much of a bigger club than Tottenham.
Question from sponsor is - who buys these kit ? Fans , ofcourse.
I would dispute "we have a bigger fan base than them". In a traditional sense we may have that. But reality is they have a massive fan base than us. Go to India or China or African countries, unfortunately they have a bigger fan base than us. Bigger fan base means more shirts sold.
We have not won a trophy for 7 years. They have won probably more than 7 trophies in that 7 years.
Depressing as it may sound for a Spurs fan, this is the reality. We can't be in denial of this.