- Nov 20, 2007
- 984
- 1,802
We should play him in his best position.
I'm a big fan but apart from workrate, he was poor todayRan his socks of all game, people in the match thread wanting him subbed just for a missed pen. Must be @Francis Gibbs alt accounts.
Fantastic performance - totally dominated
1-10 we were fantastic and once again Lamela was a fecking useless liability.
Why give the player with mentality of a jelly the penalty - Poch must have had money on 2-0
Work rate, fitness and ability to press.
It's what won the game.
.... Yep despite Lamela.
Although there was a point today I almost felt sorry for him the amout dogs abuse he was getting - but that soon passed
Why are people blaming Lamela for taking the pen off Son when we don't designate a pen taker and Lamela had the ball, was walking towards the pen spot and Son tried to take the ball off him.
Pretty certain I saw an interview saying there is a group but he lets the lads decide between them, if someone is feeling it more then they can take it. I remember him saying it around the time of Janssens pen goal. If I'm wrong and Son was the designated pen taker then fair enoug. But I don't think I am, I also think Poch would have subbed him if that were the case as he hates an ego.Is that true? Doesn't sound very Poch-like.
.... Yep despite Lamela.
Don't let the facts get in the way of the special busBoth goals came after Lamela's pressing and ball winning
Fixed your postI hate this thread with the white hot heat of a thousand Sons.
Why are people blaming Lamela for taking the pen off Son when we don't designate a pen taker and Lamela had the ball, was walking towards the pen spot and Son tried to take the ball off him.
Jesus I have heard some straw clutching in my time but this takes the biscuitBoth goals came after Lamela's pressing and ball winning