What's new

Juan Foyth

THFCSPURS19

The Speaker of the Transfer Rumours Forum
Jan 6, 2013
37,894
130,530
I wonder how PSG will work around the FFP, because Marca are reporting they've agreed the price for the transfer of Mbappe (160m). Add that to the 200m of Neymar.
Even if this transfer is nothing in relation it all adds up to a huge sum
Didn't Marca report the same about Madrid and Mbappe a couple of weeks ago and that proved to be BS? There were many reports from France yesterday that PSG weren't going to bid for Mbappe and I'm inclined to believe them.
 

the lad

Well-Known Member
Jan 31, 2013
774
1,728
Unfortunately at present it is a sellers market , market forces it is called. Unacceptable to some unfortunately. If you don't pay what is required or very close to it you don't get the player you want. With Poch doing so well for us imo I would have expected a larger Argentine contingent in our playing staff by now. Oh but wait that's right he wanted Musacchio when he arrived but we low balled and failed unsurprisingly and went for Fazio instead and that worked out really well.
 

SandroClegane

Well-Known Member
Jun 27, 2012
3,717
13,842
I wonder how PSG will work around the FFP, because Marca are reporting they've agreed the price for the transfer of Mbappe (160m). Add that to the 200m of Neymar.
Even if this transfer is nothing in relation it all adds up to a huge sum
Technically PSG didn't pay for Neymar. Qatar Sports Investments, who owns PSG, gave Neymar 300m to be an ambassador for the 2022 World Cup (in Qatar). Neymar then paid his own buyout and pocketed the rest of the money. He signed with PSG as a free agent.

https://www.thesun.co.uk/sport/foot...n-270million-to-be-2022-world-cup-ambassador/
 

Ossie85

Rio de la Plata
Aug 2, 2008
3,924
13,231
Technically PSG didn't pay for Neymar. Qatar Sports Investments, who owns PSG, gave Neymar 300m to be an ambassador for the 2022 World Cup (in Qatar). Neymar then paid his own buyout and pocketed the rest of the money. He signed with PSG as a free agent.

https://www.thesun.co.uk/sport/foot...n-270million-to-be-2022-world-cup-ambassador/

I know. I said that same thing a couple of pages back. But I presume there must be something in the FFP regarding this. It's too big a loophole
 

LukaKranjcar

Well-Known Member
May 8, 2010
914
5,418
PSG will blatantly just end their Emirates deal and sign a conveniently larger deal with Qatar Airways or something.
 

RJR1949

Well-Known Member
Jan 31, 2013
936
5,289
PSG will blatantly just end their Emirates deal and sign a conveniently larger deal with Qatar Airways or something.

The UEFA financial fair play regulations say that if there is a transaction between related parties (and in the case of PSG any part of the Qatar government or any body influenced by the Qatar government would be a related party) then UEFA can appoint a third party to assess what would be the fair value of that transaction and can use that fair value in assessing whether the financial fair play rules have been met. It's paragraph 6 of Section F if anybody is interested.

So PSG can't dodge the financial fair play rules by dodgy deals.
 

kaz Hirai

Well-Known Member
Nov 5, 2008
17,692
25,340
The UEFA financial fair play regulations say that if there is a transaction between related parties (and in the case of PSG any part of the Qatar government or any body influenced by the Qatar government would be a related party) then UEFA can appoint a third party to assess what would be the fair value of that transaction and can use that fair value in assessing whether the financial fair play rules have been met. It's paragraph 6 of Section F if anybody is interested.

So PSG can't dodge the financial fair play rules by dodgy deals.

Man City do it just fine
 

LukaKranjcar

Well-Known Member
May 8, 2010
914
5,418
The UEFA financial fair play regulations say that if there is a transaction between related parties (and in the case of PSG any part of the Qatar government or any body influenced by the Qatar government would be a related party) then UEFA can appoint a third party to assess what would be the fair value of that transaction and can use that fair value in assessing whether the financial fair play rules have been met. It's paragraph 6 of Section F if anybody is interested.

So PSG can't dodge the financial fair play rules by dodgy deals.

Its a nice premise, problem is with access to the worlds top lawyers etc, loopholes are found to get around practically any part of FFP.
 

Sweech

Ruh Roh Ressegnon
Jun 27, 2013
6,752
16,378
UEFA could and should be tougher. The rules would let them be so.
In truth FFP is supposed to prevent teams from overspending and going under - which it seems to be relatively successful with. Financial doping is only a side part and one they seem far less concerned and strict with.
 

Ossie85

Rio de la Plata
Aug 2, 2008
3,924
13,231
There's a journalist here that says that according to his family the contract was not agreed

He usually has good info
 

worcestersauce

"I'm no optimist I'm just a prisoner of hope
Jan 23, 2006
26,982
45,285
PSG

I doubt PSG would offer bad wages, so he clearly doesn't want to go there. Or he just wants reassurances of playing time
To be honest it seems that PSG have offered enough for the club to sell to them and as you say, they will pay well enough so if he really wanted to go there this would have been wrapped up ages ago, its pretty clearto me that he doesn't want to go there and if he ends up there it will under pressure and he will just be resigned to it.
I would like to think if the club had accepted our offer he'd be here by now.
Cheers for the updates by the way Ossie85.
 
Top