- Apr 21, 2005
- 9,429
- 12,383
So what's the point of keeping Janssen if we bought llorente. We don't need another hero
Fixed
So what's the point of keeping Janssen if we bought llorente. We don't need another hero
Poch had already made his plan and is just continuing with it and it didn't include Janssen, the problem is that Janssen came back before he signed for Brighton but that doesn't mean he claims a place in the squad.We bought llorente instead of a pacy wide forward? I was willing to give Janssen another season but instead we buy over 30 year old slow striker which doesn't make any sense to me at all..
I quite like this idea
Can anyone explain to me why... Llorente gives me tingles in areas that no other player does
I quite like this idea
Can anyone explain to me why... Llorente gives me tingles in areas that no other player does
I shall up this thread when we're dead last in the group.
We bought llorente instead of a pacy wide forward? I was willing to give Janssen another season but instead we buy over 30 year old slow striker which doesn't make any sense to me at all..
Why is this “Spam”?
Genuine question
Not sure why the OP got so many 'Spam' posts. It's a legitimate question for someone who perhaps hasn't had the time to keep up with the ITK chat.
Some were advocating a 'pace forward' who could double up as a striker or give Dele, Eriksen and Son a challenge for a starting berth. In reality the only player of this sort of ilk mentioned was Anthony Martial, and it soon became apparent that was going nowhere.
I think Llorente is a good signing. Kane will need a rest or will get injured. Pochettino hasn't seen enough from Janssen for him to be confident that he can drive us on and be an adequate replacement so invested. A decent signing, I think as in reality asking a top striker to come and play second fiddle to Kane was always going to be a big ask.