- Sep 2, 2013
- 15,170
- 72,170
This thread has more twists than a Chubby Checker convention
Be proud to be confused; its society's crime, not yoursDoesn’t Poch ‘keep backing Tripps over KWP’?
I’m confused.
Stop shouting...This thread has more twists than a Chubby Checker convention
Didn't Barkley also have a long-term injury a couple of years ago? Could be further cause for concern.If we wanted RB even now, we could of got him. Medically it is a MASSIVE risk, and another factor, which I will not disclose. Close that chapter now please.
No it couldn't.
With that I'm done for this window.
"Not gambling on Barkley is injury related and nothing more"
That sounds like ITK, not opinion.
In general...
Sissokko plays in nearly every fucking game. If the manager thought he was as shit as some of you he wouldn't, end of story.
This is not ITK, it's just blatantly bloody obvious. Just because you don't rate a player it doesn't mean the manager doesn't.
Ffs it can't really be that difficult to understand. Can it?
Not gambling on Barkley is injury related and nothing more. Sissokko has no bearing or relevance whatsoever!
You keep ignoring this other factor Hercules keeps speaking of.
This isn't the I love Sissoko thread.This post should be stickied at the top of every SC thread.
The refusal to accept the mountains of evidence that Poch, for whatever reasons, values Sissoko and thinks he's an important part of the team structure is simply staggering.
It's also becoming embarrassing.
I'm not ignoring anything. That's completely irrelevant to what I was responding to.
You were earlier and you still are. Insisting that we don’t have any ITK which is conflicting when there clearly is. We have one ITK saying it’s down to injury and nothing else and another who’s said there’s more to it than just the injury.
So which one is it?
If we wanted RB even now, we could of got him. Medically it is a MASSIVE risk, and another factor, which I will not disclose. Close that chapter now please.