C0YS
Just another member
- Jul 9, 2007
- 12,780
- 13,817
The cards really came in after Chelsea equalised though, its an important point to make.
Liverpool vs Spurs Match Thread
- Thread starter Bulletspur
- Start date
worcestersauce
"I'm no optimist I'm just a prisoner of hope
- Jan 23, 2006
- 26,966
- 45,256
Sorry guys I don't know where to find them, if my memory serves me well it was when he was playing for Basel before going to Chelsea, about the time he refused to shake hands with Israeli players in the Champions League game.
Let me make it plain, I wasn't accusing him of antisemitism just responding to a post that refered to us being able to buy him but didn't so I was giving another angle as to why that might be so, he was young and maybe felt a certain expectation on him due to his background, I don't know.
nightgoat
Well-Known Member
- Sep 12, 2005
- 24,604
- 21,898
Did you hear him today? Gary Neville must have looked like he'd just come out of a bukkake party after Salah's second goal.
Cavehillspur
Well-Known Member
- Jan 28, 2011
- 14,074
- 18,418
My pool supporting mate in the 85th minute on award of our first pen came out with "Spurs deserve to win to be honest". 5 mins later "we were robbed" etc etc 
Jody
SC Supporter
- Sep 11, 2004
- 7,008
- 5,826
Not as bad as the Mirror.
I understand the historical context to the mirror blowing smoke up their arse but this is unreal...
"Referee Jon Moss pointed to the spot well after the allotted four minutes of stoppage time, to give what appeared a ridiculously soft award to the visitors when sub Eric Lamela backed into Liverpool's Virgil van Dijk.
It was a shocking decision from the official, who also gave Spurs another dubious spot kick, after an outrageous Kane dive."
FibreOpticJesus
Well-Known Member
- Aug 14, 2005
- 2,824
- 5,051
As for poch's substitutes never change a match, wanyama scored and lamela won a pen. Not too shabby this time
And Llorente's header
nightgoat
Well-Known Member
- Sep 12, 2005
- 24,604
- 21,898
Maccabi Tel Aviv in a CL qualifier. Didn't shake hands with their players in either leg. Once you could probably make an excuse for it. Twice is just a bit too much of a coincidence.
Cavehillspur
Well-Known Member
- Jan 28, 2011
- 14,074
- 18,418
Infuriating stuff
KILLA_SIN
Well-Known Member
- May 24, 2008
- 7,949
- 14,688
Not really cool
nightgoat
Well-Known Member
- Sep 12, 2005
- 24,604
- 21,898
I mean Sky had three ex Liverpool players as pundits and even they could all bring themselves to admit they were both correct decisions.
slartibartfast
Grunge baby forever
- Oct 21, 2012
- 18,320
- 33,955
To be fair I got so sick of commentary after 4mins I turned it off so I couldnt hear it. Maybe he's trying so hard not to be biased against them he's going the other way.
Whatever I hate the fker lol.
Last edited:
FibreOpticJesus
Well-Known Member
- Aug 14, 2005
- 2,824
- 5,051
Mong!!!!! Terrace language Sugar Ray...my dog is 57 varieties and he knows more about footy than dear Jamie any day but no need for 70's insults.
Univarn
Lost. Probably Not Worth Finding.
- Jul 20, 2017
- 2,864
- 15,279
Prob just salty he had his whole article ready to publish wanking himself into a coma about Salah and a magic Liverpool only to realize he had to rewrite it at the last minute. Poor bloke
Trix
Well-Known Member
- Jul 29, 2004
- 19,540
- 330,709
The problem isn't whether this decision was right or wrong, it's that the rule is interpreted slightly differently by ever referee/linesman. It's often the case that the linesman and ref disagree on decisions, and that really should not be the case
Is he interfering with play?
When does he become active?
When should the reset point be?
Etc, etc, etc. The game hasn't become that much more attacking since the rule change, just far more contentious. At least everyone knew where they stood with the old rule, and there was nothing wrong at all with how it worked
I think with the new rules, the player will be called offside ONLY when he touches the ball.
There've been many cases, in other games, where a player was in an offside position, but when a team mate of his floated the ball over the opposing defence, the said player (knowing that he's in an offside position) just leaves the ball and allows another team mate (who's not offside) to run in and play the ball. This situation would not be ruled as offside.
In Harry's case, if Lovren had NOT touched the ball, then Kane would have been called offside when he made contact with the ball.
tony0379
The bald midget has to go!
- May 17, 2004
- 15,912
- 41,629
So so so nearly right
spids
Well-Known Member
- Jul 19, 2015
- 6,647
- 27,841
The fact is we drew the game. You can’t rewrite history.
Colonel_Klinck
Well-Known Member
- May 19, 2004
- 12,719
- 23,323
If Klopp wants to play that high press footy, which in the first half they did very well, he needs to get them fitter. They were fucked in the second half and just couldn't hunt us down in packs anymore. Unless they score 3 goals in the time when they still have enough in the tank to press, they are always going to be wide open when their legs go. As frustrating as the first half was you have give Poch credit for sticking with it. He knew we were fitter and eventually we'd be able to play through them. Still we need to cut out the stupid mistakes at the back/midfield when pressed. We could have been 3 down by halftime. We were also wasteful up front again. Still a cracking game of footy and pleased the guys never gave up even in injury time when 2-1 down. Spurs teams of the past would have crumbled at that point.
StartingPrice
Chief Sardonicus Hyperlip
- Feb 13, 2004
- 32,568
- 10,280
It did, didn't it. I thought it had when I first saw it and have been looking for a replay to check - so thanks for verifying.
