What's new

Wilfried Zaha

tiger666

tiger666

Large Member
Jan 4, 2005
27,978
82,216
But anyway, back to Zaha. That's mentioning £30m plus £15m add ons and a clause. That's miles off the £70m we were hearing earlier but I believe an ITK said the real fee would be lower? I may be wrong.
 
Kingellesar

Kingellesar

This is the way
May 2, 2005
8,772
9,276
Maybe Aurier is going to Palace to link up with Zaha, we have been fooled by agent Aurier!!

No but I would like this deal to be done, would add another element to our attack and its a player I think Poch can improve, he is good but still bags of potential for me.
 
dtxspurs

dtxspurs

Welcome to the Good Life
Dec 28, 2017
11,234
46,574
tiger666 said:
But anyway, back to Zaha. That's mentioning £30m plus £15m add ons and a clause. That's miles off the £70m we were hearing earlier but I believe an ITK said the real fee would be lower? I may be wrong.
Click to expand...
I read it as 45 mil plus 15 in add ons. Probably a fair deal all things considered. 30 was what Chelsea offered plus Drinkwater, all falls in line with what ITK told us today. Only part that is unnerving is Lucas & Serge.
 
wrd

wrd

Well-Known Member
Aug 22, 2014
13,603
58,005
Not sure what people expected, we were told it was the same source that rose did the interview with last summer and they've embellished slightly with the moura/aurier stuff. it's the sun the best you can hope for is a 50% credible piece.
 
tiger666

tiger666

Large Member
Jan 4, 2005
27,978
82,216
dtxspurs said:
I read it as 45 mil plus 15 in add ons. Probably a fair deal all things considered. 30 was what Chelsea offered plus Drinkwater, all falls in line with what ITK told us today. Only part that is unnerving is Lucas & Serge.
Click to expand...

I wouldn't call Aurier leaving unnerving. KWP can step up but yeah, I don't buy it or the Moura part.
 
S

synththfc

Well-Known Member
Aug 24, 2017
3,740
26,716
Pretty much everything that Pablo said is in the article, so one must assume there's at least something in it
 
SpartanSpur

SpartanSpur

Well-Known Member
Jan 27, 2011
12,560
43,102
tiger666 said:
But anyway, back to Zaha. That's mentioning £30m plus £15m add ons and a clause. That's miles off the £70m we were hearing earlier but I believe an ITK said the real fee would be lower? I may be wrong.
Click to expand...

I read it as £45 rising to £60m with add ons. Sell on fee does not sound very Levy though.

Quite a few things seemed off in that article actually, I'd be surprised if we were binning Moura off already, especially for no profit. Made out Grealish was an alternative to Zaha/Martial too.

But it does all fit in well with Herc's ITK as the Sun were good on us last summer.
 
GetSpurredOn

GetSpurredOn

Well-Known Member
Jun 18, 2006
5,022
8,922
Hopefully this moves quick, significant amount of ITK that Poch really rates Zaha, so be good to give him a player off his list.
 
Univarn

Univarn

Lost. Probably Not Worth Finding.
Jul 20, 2017
2,864
15,279
THFCSPURS19 said:
Zaha stuff is interesting but difficult to believe with the Moura stuff and the suggestion that Zaha is an alternative to Grealish, which makes no sense at all.
Click to expand...
Yeah but this summer I'm pretty sure they've been a tire fire of trash on us. They've been heavily snorting the Kane and Poch leaving dust.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

mawspurs
Tottenham plotting to sign Wilfried Zaha
Replies
6
Views
1K
Jolmaster
Jolmaster
THFCSPURS19
Player Watch Player Watch: James Maddison
220 221 222
Replies
4K
Views
780K
keithtighe93
keithtighe93
THFCSPURS19
Mateo Kovacic
66 67 68
Replies
1K
Views
269K
spursfan77
spursfan77
Top