But it's the Sun.Well that article is lies. Get rid of moura? No chance
I read it as 45 mil plus 15 in add ons. Probably a fair deal all things considered. 30 was what Chelsea offered plus Drinkwater, all falls in line with what ITK told us today. Only part that is unnerving is Lucas & Serge.But anyway, back to Zaha. That's mentioning £30m plus £15m add ons and a clause. That's miles off the £70m we were hearing earlier but I believe an ITK said the real fee would be lower? I may be wrong.
Yeah and I was hoping for Kelly Brook to lick the smegma from my bell end. I reckon I got more chance.Was hoping for a nice, credible sounding, article on Zaha this evening lol
I read it as 45 mil plus 15 in add ons. Probably a fair deal all things considered. 30 was what Chelsea offered plus Drinkwater, all falls in line with what ITK told us today. Only part that is unnerving is Lucas & Serge.
But anyway, back to Zaha. That's mentioning £30m plus £15m add ons and a clause. That's miles off the £70m we were hearing earlier but I believe an ITK said the real fee would be lower? I may be wrong.
Unnerving an over reaction but I would like to try him out for another season.I wouldn't call Aurier leaving unnerving. KWP can step up bt yeah, I don't buy it or the Moura part.
Only part that is unnerving is Lucas & Serge.
Yeah but this summer I'm pretty sure they've been a tire fire of trash on us. They've been heavily snorting the Kane and Poch leaving dust.Zaha stuff is interesting but difficult to believe with the Moura stuff and the suggestion that Zaha is an alternative to Grealish, which makes no sense at all.
Anyone got any idea what this means? Apologies in advance if I'm missing the obvious, it's been a long one todayLucas Moura ???
Anyone got any idea what this means? Apologies in advance if I'm missing the obvious, it's been a long one today