I can actually kind of sympathise with that error. It was a communication fuck up rather than someone getting the rules of the game wrong or operating the equipment poorly. Still massively incompetent, but shit happens.Oof, the "human error" was that VAR thought the onfield decision was that Diaz was onside so they said "check complete" to confirm he was indeed onside... what a cluster fuck.
That vote is purely about fantasy players trying to get bonus points.Premier League official site had Sonny down as MOTM
Nope, Liverpool were definitely robbed. It's only fair to set a precedent by having a replay at a neutral venue.Nah fuck this. We made Alisson make two world class saves, had multiple other opportunities that we didn’t take advantage of. We missed a little finesse at the end but to say we were lucky is total shit.
We deserved the win fair and square.
There has been so much uproar about this yet what is the diference between this and the ref miscommunicating something with his assistant?I can actually kind of sympathise with that error. It was a communication fuck up rather than someone getting the rules of the game wrong or operating the equipment poorly. Still massively incompetent, but shit happens.
How do you winner and laugh emoji the same post?Obviously the greatest thing in the world would be us winning the league. But a close second would be Liverpool missing out on the league by 1 point thanks to us.
Their forwards are murder for the snidey technical fouls. Just as a break is happening, the arm tug, the run across the back of someone's legs for a clip etc. The innocent I didn't meant it ref hands go up straight away. They live by the sword they die by the sword.......fuck 'emI would say Jota had a culmination of tackles though, plus should been sent off last year
I would say most late tackles are just late and not intended to injure anyone, it doesn’t make it any less reckless or dangerousI disagree. It was an accident. His foot makes contact with top half of the ball, the ball rolls and brings his foot into contact with Bissouma’s leg. Because of his momentum it could have seriously injured Bissouma but he wasn’t reckless, he had no intent or used excessive force. It was an accident and in football as in life they happen. It’s like if Your car sloops on ice and crashes into another car - it’s not a punishable offense just an accident. I know many of you agree but if it had been the other way around you would be making this same argument.
The Udogie freekick wasn't mentioned by Sky at all. He clearly played the ball. Neville was too busy going on about the red card being wrong but was a clear red going by the rules.Embarrassing from VAR. Yes it has implications for the wider game and shouldn’t happen but in terms of this game, so what?
The goal they actually scored came from a free kick which should never have been given. Udogie clearly played the ball and pulled his leg out of the follow through. Never a foul let alone a yellow. Why is no one talking about that?
The straight red was correct, the rules may be deemed harsh but they are there to protect players. There was no malicious intent, but there doesn’t need to be. Could have broken Bissouma’s leg. He was lucky, as was Vic last week.
Jota can’t help getting a soft first yellow but is still an idiot for then getting himself sent off with a silly second.
We weren’t great today at all, but they can sod off with the sob stories