What's new

Match Threads Spurs vs Liverpool - Match Day 7 - 30th Sept KO 5:30pm

Date
Sep 30, 2023
KO Time
5:30pm

Match Prediction

  • Spurs Win

    Votes: 92 47.9%
  • Liverpool Win

    Votes: 38 19.8%
  • Score Draw

    Votes: 62 32.3%
  • Goalless Draw

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    192

spoon

Well-Known Member
Jun 23, 2004
338
790
I don’t think anyone else has mentioned it but did you notice Richarlison rush over to Matip, at the final whiske, to console him for the og. Nice touch by him- a good guy.
Nah, I was too busy laughing at him and Liverpool. Sorry, not sorry.
 

Pochemon94

Well-Known Member
Aug 6, 2019
1,617
4,390
It feels like they are threatening PGMOL and putting out inflamitory statements to essentially cause a massive uproar that in the future, refs/VAR will be scared to intervene anything negative to em going forward. If this happened the other way around, you really think their supporters would be screaming for a rematch, they would be mocking us online relentlessly calling it "spursy".

Also another great note made by the Robbies on their podcast was that this feels like a new squad with new outcomes and that under Mourinho or Conte we wouldn't of gotten that winner, the luck would've been the other way around.
 

g_harry

Well-Known Member
Sep 27, 2005
2,946
4,648
It feels like they are threatening PGMOL and putting out inflamitory statements to essentially cause a massive uproar that in the future, refs/VAR will be scared to intervene anything negative to em going forward. If this happened the other way around, you really think their supporters would be screaming for a rematch, they would be mocking us online relentlessly calling it "spursy".

Also another great note made by the Robbies on their podcast was that this feels like a new squad with new outcomes and that under Mourinho or Conte we wouldn't of gotten that winner, the luck would've been the other way around.
Think they reckon by challenging the red card decision they will get that overturned because of the offside call. They really are different breed.

Hope the FA add an extra game suspension for challenging the decision as it's a clear red.
 

Dannyspur

I just don't know anymore!
Aug 17, 2004
10,158
13,899
With regards to the red card, if Jones caught the top 1/2 inch of the ball then his foot was 8 inches off the ground when he went in for the tackle. That is high enough to be deemed a red in itself irrespective of intent.
 

Archibald&Crooks

Aegina Expat
Admin
Feb 1, 2005
55,712
206,006
Breaking News on BBC. Pool have formally requested the VAR audio recording of the game 🙄
According to the BBC, they have released VAR audio on six other occasions already this season so this is hardly an earth shattering development. But that statement of theirs leaves them open to all sorts. I'm wondering if they are making so much noise for effect, so that things don't get swept under the carpet any more but it's clear that at some point they simply have to let it go. I think this is almost becoming as damaging to them as it already is to VAR.
 
Last edited:

Gb160

Well done boys. Good process
Jun 20, 2012
23,731
93,840
According to the BBC, they have released VAR audio on six other occasions already this season so this is hardly an earth shattering development. But that statement of theirs leaves them open to all sorts. I'm wondering if they are making so much noise for effect, so that things don't get swept under the carpet any more but it's clear that at some point they simply have to let it go. I think this is almost becoming as damaging to them as it is to VAR.
Interesting to know what their end game is here. There's obviously not some conspiracy against them. Some humans made a big cock up. It happens, humans do that sometimes...they always have and always will.
Are they going to demand that humans don't make mistakes anymore?

They're just looking ridiculous to the entire football world, minus their loony fans who are lapping it up.
 

carmeldevil

Well-Known Member
May 15, 2018
7,716
46,385
Interesting to know what their end game is here. There's obviously not some conspiracy against them. Some humans made a big cock up. It happens, humans do that sometimes...they always have and always will.
Are they going to demand that humans don't make mistakes anymore?

They're just looking ridiculous to the entire football world, minus their loony fans who are lapping it up.

Add in the media going along for the ride for the attention/clicks etc
 

Oscar22

Well-Known Member
Apr 9, 2004
16,929
15,688
They should send them a recording of some vaguely Saudi sounding, scooby doo villain voices, lots of crackling and whispers with the only clear words being “Now say check complete” and “City must prosper”.
 

TOLBINY

Well-Known Member
Feb 4, 2019
1,244
2,844
According to the BBC, they have released VAR audio on six other occasions already this season so this is hardly an earth shattering development. But that statement of theirs leaves them open to all sorts. I'm wondering if they are making so much noise for effect, so that things don't get swept under the carpet any more but it's clear that at some point they simply have to let it go. I think this is almost becoming as damaging to them as it is to VAR.
The 6 audios were released as part of the Match Officials Mi'cd Up show with M Owen and Howard Webb. AFAIK they have never been released following a club request.
 

josh

Well-Known Member
Nov 28, 2006
75
296
This may already have been covered, but I missed it if so. But it seems the referee, from his facial reaction, was aware that a mistake had been made by VAR almost immediately after the restart of play. Presumably the VAR people were saying to him that they meant it was a goal, but he considered he could not do anything as he had already restarted play.

But was he right? Could he not have acknowledged immediately that a mistake had been made and award the goal, albeit a few seconds belatedly? Obviously, a replay is impossible, but it would be no injustice to stop play and make the correct decision a few seconds late. If the law currently says this cannot happen, then surely a simple law change could resolve the problem.
 

Bluto Blutarsky

Well-Known Member
Mar 4, 2021
15,467
71,717
This may already have been covered, but I missed it if so. But it seems the referee, from his facial reaction, was aware that a mistake had been made by VAR almost immediately after the restart of play. Presumably the VAR people were saying to him that they meant it was a goal, but he considered he could not do anything as he had already restarted play.

But was he right? Could he not have acknowledged immediately that a mistake had been made and award the goal, albeit a few seconds belatedly? Obviously, a replay is impossible, but it would be no injustice to stop play and make the correct decision a few seconds late. If the law currently says this cannot happen, then surely a simple law change could resolve the problem.
That is the current state of the laws - and you are right, it should be changed to give the officials more discretion here.
 

fishhhandaricecake

Well-Known Member
Nov 15, 2018
19,598
48,953
According to the BBC, they have released VAR audio on six other occasions already this season so this is hardly an earth shattering development. But that statement of theirs leaves them open to all sorts. I'm wondering if they are making so much noise for effect, so that things don't get swept under the carpet any more but it's clear that at some point they simply have to let it go. I think this is almost becoming as damaging to them as it already is to VAR.
What did their latest statement say? Why does it leave them open?

They bloody love to kick up a stink. Such an annoying club.
 

Similar threads

Top