- Mar 18, 2005
- 34,372
- 83,747
Why? Would you take Caulker back?
I don't think it was a mistake to get rid of him at all, it was good business by the club.
I think that was his point.
Why? Would you take Caulker back?
I don't think it was a mistake to get rid of him at all, it was good business by the club.
He's a talented academy graduate who hasn't been given his chance at Spurs. There was also a woeful decision to send him to WBA last season, he's been treated badly.
If he's given a chance and doesn't make it, then fine. But to simply toss a hot prospect away after a bad injury and a dodgy loan, sends out a terrible message to anyone coming through the academy.
I think that was his point.
How has he been treated badly? He's been injured for ages and I doubt he'd have gone to WBA if he didn't want to. He was given a chance to play some football which, for whatever reason, didn't happen.
He wasn't treated badly yes but he went to WBA and hadn't fully recovered then he got injured again.
Im only saying it because when Caulker left everybody went into meltdown, no other reasonWhy? Would you take Caulker back?
I don't think it was a mistake to get rid of him at all, it was good business by the club.
Was it a recurrence of the same injury? I don't know but he's had a miserable time. If we are going to go with the small squad setup Poch seems to favour, it really is important to have players who can stay fit IMO.
How has he been treated badly? He's been injured for ages and I doubt he'd have gone to WBA if he didn't want to. He was given a chance to play some football which, for whatever reason, didn't happen.
I find this hard to believe. It was less than a year ago (August 2015) that he signed his new deal which runs until 2019.
I believe that Poch rates him and that what may have happened is that some clubs like Bournemouth etc may have made some enquiries and we haven't immediately rejected them which has led to this speculation. He needs to be given at least 1 season, hopefully injury free, to try and make an impact. He's been patient and earned at least that imo.
Badly handled is what I should have put. I think it would be wrong for us to let him go without giving him a chance. 8m sounds like a lot, but it's nothing these days, especially with the new telly money. Would rather we took a hit on the transfer fee and gave the guy his chance to shine. The alternative sends a poor signal to other academy players.
Get injured and we will cut you loose.
Sucky sucky, love you long time.What would £8m do for us though?