- Jan 20, 2006
- 45,213
- 8,229
But we just ignore that and carry on calling it the Lane.
It's true, nobody calls the immigrants toilet seat 'asburton' or 'the grove' it's 'the emirates' to them
50-55k with an option to increase is what we need. We wouldnt sell out all home games to crap non london teams like sunderland/boro/etc, as well as midweek cup games against lowly opposition when teh games are coming thick and fast. People just cant afford the time or money to go to all these games.
About half a dozen of you are saying this but what do you mean 'an option to expand'. Planning permmission yes but how do you actually physically expand without costly demolishing and dismantling. I've yet so see an effective 'crane in an extra tier' type plan anywhere in the UK. Somebody said MK Dons are going to do it - how exactly ? Man U steadily increased capacity but that was over 20 years and most of it was from a new stand.
And they were able do to so precisely because they'd originally built that stand with the "option to expand" both planning and structurally!
they'res also a fuckload of room around old trafford..
whl is on a very small site
There is nowhere else in Tottenham to move, and I really don't see the point in buying up all the land if we aren't expanding the ground or building a new one north of Paxton Road. The only ITK I have is what I posted back in December, that we've been making moves to buy up the houses at the north end of Worcester Avenue.
There is apparently going to be an item about this on BBC's London news programme tonight. A lot of local residents are really pissed off with the Gooners and their broken promises.
One thing Sugarlump failed signally to do was endear himself to the local community. Since Levy and ENIC took over the club has made major efforts to rebuild bridges. But if we make undertakings to improve the area we really do have to keep them.
On the transport front, I don't see much chance of the tube extension to Northumberland Park happening. It's an economic nonsense.
About half a dozen of you are saying this but what do you mean 'an option to expand'. Planning permmission yes but how do you actually physically expand without costly demolishing and dismantling. I've yet so see an effective 'crane in an extra tier' type plan anywhere in the UK. Somebody said MK Dons are going to do it - how exactly ? Man U steadily increased capacity but that was over 20 years and most of it was from a new stand.
And note: We don't have to go for some yankee-style bowl just to build a long term solution with no said 'option to expand'
Not before the present uncertainty in the financial markets is resolved.
Levy is no Scholar. I get the idea that alarmingly few people realise just how close we came to having no Spurs at all seventeen years ago—Sugarlump gets ridiculed for claiming that if it hadn't been for him there would be a Tesco's where the Lane is, but it wasn't too much of an exaggeration.
Not before the present uncertainty in the financial markets is resolved.
Levy is no Scholar. I get the idea that alarmingly few people realise just how close we came to having no Spurs at all seventeen years ago—Sugarlump gets ridiculed for claiming that if it hadn't been for him there would be a Tesco's where the Lane is, but it wasn't too much of an exaggeration.