- Jan 27, 2011
- 847
- 3,058
I wish the people accusing the owners of criminal behaviour would provide some evidence.
I might be a bit if a cynic but all the stuff coming from Archway is a bit think.
Now i'm no arsonist but if I was doing this to speed up a CPO I would not leave two petrol cans lying around as evidence
unless I wanted to make sure the public were convinced it was arson and leave the owner looking very innocent
this stinks of a conspiracy to me
Are you embarrassed to be a human when you hear on the news that a human has done something horrific?
He said human.I have never been embarrassed by anything that Piers Morgan or Jordan does
Reverse psychology.
If i was an arsonist (which I hasten to add I am not), I would leave the petrol cans there in the thinking that the police would think to themselves that no arsonist would leave two petrol cans behind, thus laying the blame directly at the more sinister door.
Well exactly... And what is it? 1 week per full year of service?
I believe its a minimum of £384 tax free per year worked. 1 company I was at, but unfortunately not made redundant, paid a month per year!
Yes, because that's the same.
We grow up identifying ourself with a certain group of people and I don't think it's strange to be disappointed when fellow members of that group do something negative or shed a negative light on the group.
I think it's a similar situation to when religious extremists carry out negative things, you expect moderates to be disappointed/ashamed/condemn it.
To be honest, some of the things British people have done throughout history make me ashamed to be British.
If you were a really clever arsonist, you'd not leave the cans there, in case the police thought that no arsonist would ever leave two petrol cans behind, but then thought that a clever arsonist would leave the cans so the police would think no real arsonist could've done it, thus leading to a never-ending circular paradox where the fire couldn't have been caused by an arsonist, and at the same time was almost certainly caused by an arsonist...
Confused the fuck out of me, that's for sure.
Or visit a match thread !All you need to do is turn on "The only way is Essex" to get a good idea there is something seriously wrong with this country.
Yes, because that's the same.
We grow up identifying ourself with a certain group of people and I don't think it's strange to be disappointed when fellow members of that group do something negative or shed a negative light on the group.
I think it's a similar situation to when religious extremists carry out negative things, you expect moderates to be disappointed/ashamed/condemn it.
To be honest, some of the things British people have done throughout history make me ashamed to be British.
First reaction on reading this was that Archway needed better security
Second reaction is that there must be a cheaper way of burning a place down than using two cans of petrol, even with the recent drop in oil prices, petrol still isn't cheap
I wish the people accusing the owners of criminal behaviour would provide some evidence.
I am not condoning threatening tweets, or aggressive behaviour at all.
But they were as recently as September not reported by Archway and were ignoring them, if they genuinely felt a threat or were worried about the legitimacy of claims that were more than idiotic distance tweets surely they would have reported them?
In the words of Theadora Josif on FB '..We are ignoring it for now..'.
The for now just seems to have met an almost too convenient lapse in regards to whats happened.
Just playing devils advocate for all those willing to blame a Spurs fan straightaway.