- Oct 21, 2003
- 3,503
- 1,767
I 'disliked' the way you made your comment so personal and negative Steve. If it makes you feel better to 'dislike' some random thread of mine like you just did - so be it - but maybe you could bear in mind you don't speak for everybody on here and you are not the authority on what's right or wrong about spurs. That's why we have a forum - to share opinions and discuss different perspectives, none of us are ever going to get it all right, so why get so worked up about it? At least, if you disagree or dislike this comment I will understand why - otherwise why not just take it on the chin that someone didn't like the comment you made and not go desperately trying to dislike something they've said?
I agree with davidmatzdorf that Ade is not fully fit and up for the games, which makes sense given that he's just been injured.. right? What are the finer points of football that only you seem to know about?
Your double standards are astonishing. Matzdorf comes on here and patronisingly calls people fuckwits and intimates that few of the posters in this thread have a brain and yet you consider my post negative and personal - did you dislike his post the same then? I called him out specifically for comments he made which he invited due to his tone and manner. When did I say I spoke for everyone on here or that I was the authority on Spurs? Find that post and quote it please.
Mate you've disliked my comment without bothering to articulate why but have now been stirred to respond because i returned the favour - and you tell me to take it on the chin? If you can't take it don't dish it out. I try not to use the neg ratings and prefer to respond in writing to stuff I disagree with. You couldn't be arsed and now get upset when I do the same to you. I'm happy for people to disagree, it's the whole point of debate and discussion but if you don't articulate anything there is no debate - at least it's up for discussion now.
As for Adebayor and Defoe I find it incredible that he thinks Defoe's movement off the ball for his teammates (or even himself) is better than Adebayor's. Defoe is good at thinking about Defoe - he's reactive and his movement reflects that. His runs off the ball are for himself mostly and even then his movement is limited. Adebayor's movement is much more intelligent and as a result he's a better team player who not only gets in good positions himself but makes space for others and assists them to score.
As for Adebayor's fitness (which I didn't mention) I have no idea how it currently is and nor I suspect do many on here. I agree he was previously unfit and then injured but I've no doubt where Defoe injured Adebayor would be deemed fit enough to start.
If you wanna dish it out then explain why first would be my suggestion - it's better all round.