- Jul 10, 2008
- 16,041
- 48,810
Bottom line is he scores stacks of goals. I'd say that was good for a striker.
But he scores those goals playing in midfield. Why change?
Bottom line is he scores stacks of goals. I'd say that was good for a striker.
It's a team sport and Bales abilities are best used from an attacking midfield position rather than with his back to goal IMO.
All strikers go missing. The reason is because they are the furthest up the pitch, so will see less of the ball if the team isnt playing well.
Bale would never be an out and out striker, but would play in the whole with the license to find space.
BTW Ronaldo never gets frustrated and shoots, he shoots on site. Someting Bale has learned to do too.
How comes Defoe get's such a hard time then? He's scored 14 goals and Bale has scored 13 goals. Anyway bottom line is he should start on the left, he is the only player we have that can give us genuine width there.Bottom line is he scores stacks of goals. I'd say that was good for a striker.
He would score more goals as a striker than any other player anyone on here wanted to spend over £20m on in the summer. But he's not a striker apparently
Lets just leave him in the free role AVB seems to have given him recently and let him carry on causing havoc its worked well so far.
Case in point - the goals he scored against Norwich recently wouldn't have happened if he was playing a striker. Similarly the hat trick against Inter. Bale is at his best when he has space to run into not when he has his back to goal in tight areas of the pitch.
But he scores those goals playing in midfield. Why change?
How comes Defoe get's such a hard time then? He's scored 14 goals and Bale has scored 13 goals. Anyway bottom line is he should start on the left, he is the only player we have that can give us genuine width there.
Because he scores a lot more as a striker. You maximise your assets.