- Feb 21, 2006
- 4,833
- 4,259
Linked again, discuss.
Could you post the link?Linked again, discuss.
We could do a hell of a lot worse than a player that scored 19 Prem goals last season, and we could probably get him for a bargain price.Good back-up that would score goals.
I don't see everyone's issue. People thinking we're gonna get anyone near Kane's level are fucking deluded.
We could do a hell of a lot worse than a player that scored 19 Prem goals last season, and we could probably get him for a bargain price.
I think they'd just be glad to get some cash considering his contract is up at the end of the season.We could even chuck em a couple of loan players to soften the blow.
I actually think being a back up would be perfect for him because he has had injury problems so would put less stress on his body if he wasnt playing week in week out.I dont get this from Spurs, absolute no brainer from my viewpoint and fits what we need. Proven goal scorer, can hit ground running from january if Kane gets injured can be effective cover, cheap low wages, can play alome up front, what is the catch?
Why not nab him and one for the future? Does he want to be a first choice and play every week? That is the only reason I can think.
He is no world star or elite talent, but if Kane gets injured we need someone who can come in, replace him and bang in some goals.
As with Vardy last summer, yep. Come on hipsters neg the shit out of me with your cock in had watching YouTube clips of Embolo
Are you saying you'd prefer Austin to Embolo?